MSI MS-16R3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics38.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star GF63 Thin 9SC
MotherboardMSI MS-16R3  (all builds)
Memory24 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200326
Uptime16.6 Days
Run DateMay 15 '24 at 19:09
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Memory 80.9
1-Core 112
2-Core 200
75% 131 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 566
59% 473 Pts
64-Core 577
36% 577 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile Max-Q)
MSI(1462 127E) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.4633
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Lighting 50.1
Reflection 57.9
Parallax 32.3
41% 46.8 fps
MRender 37.2
Gravity 45.4
Splatting 44.8
35% 42.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 40%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA7301Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,166
Write 1,487
Mixed 1,250
361% 1,634 MB/s
4K Read 47.1
4K Write 71.4
4K Mixed 55.4
180% 58 MB/s
DQ Read 627
DQ Write 404
DQ Mixed 493
374% 508 MB/s
Poor: 130% Great: 296%
WD Green 480GB (2018)-$69
13GB free
Firmware: UG220400
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 402
Write 349
Mixed 265
75% 339 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 29.9
4K Mixed 11
39% 15.7 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 101
DQ Mixed 32.8
45% 83.4 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 60%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 123GB
96GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 133
Write 50.8
Mixed 43.3
80% 75.7 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.5
139% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HX426S15IB2/16 KHX2666C15S4/16G 32GB
2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
74.7% Very good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 23.2
75% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 32
SC Mixed 25.3
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 80.2
50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 37: 0P 4R 3G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
37% 33% 45 208 56 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO76A8
Typical MS-16R3 Builds (Compare 1,998 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16R3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback