Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 82H8

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (95th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 5 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics17.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago.
SystemLenovo 82H8  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory5.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230906
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 19 '24 at 15:58
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User SAU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Memory 75.6
1-Core 156
2-Core 265
90% 165 Pts
4-Core 459
8-Core 660
70% 560 Pts
64-Core 653
40% 653 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Legend(17AA 3F9A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
17.9% Very poor
Lighting 21.5
Reflection 25.1
Parallax 25.2
18% 23.9 fps
MRender 19.7
Gravity 30.5
Splatting 19.3
19% 23.2 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron MTFDHBA512QFD 512GB
106GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0013P6LN Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,246
Write 900
Mixed 660
207% 935 MB/s
4K Read 51.8
4K Write 90.1
4K Mixed 60.5
204% 67.5 MB/s
DQ Read 611
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 271
249% 391 MB/s
Poor: 97% Great: 229%
MXT-USB Storage Device 128GB
69GB free, PID 8816
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 17.9
Write 17
Mixed 16.1
22% 17 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 3
203% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44BB0-CWE M471A5244CB0-CWE 12GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
69.4% Good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 20.8
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 33.3
SC Mixed 13.2
59% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 85
47% 85 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 8: 0P 1R 1G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
8% 15% 13 215 56 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE08D5
Typical 82H8 Builds (Compare 4,427 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82H8

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback