Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-16R1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star GF63 8RC
MotherboardMSI MS-16R1  (all builds)
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180612
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 13 '24 at 06:58
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User LKA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 0.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
39.3% Below average
Memory 64.7
1-Core 37.5
2-Core 42.2
35% 48.1 Pts
4-Core 80
8-Core 102
12% 91.1 Pts
64-Core 135
8% 135 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
MSI(1462 123C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2127
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
4.45% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 5.6
Parallax 5.2
4% 5.07 fps
MRender 7.8
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 7.4
6% 7.5 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.45%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AST280 240GB
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H190505
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 130 97 141 130 148 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 402
Write 242
Mixed 244
SusWrite 127
56% 254 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 35.4
4K Mixed 17.1
67% 23.3 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 17.3
DQ Mixed 21.7
34% 69.2 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 103%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
877GB free
Firmware: 2AR10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 102 104 102 102 104 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Read 102
Write 63.8
Mixed 52
SusWrite 101
58% 79.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
122% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 59%
WD My Passport 25E1 2TB
512GB free, PID 25e1
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 73 72 72 73 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
32.4% Below average
Read 74.3
Write 76.7
Mixed 43.6
SusWrite 72
90% 66.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 8A76 LD4AS008G-H2666G 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
44.6% Average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 15.7
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 16.9
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 50 19 60 27" 1280 720 DEL40F7 DELL P2717H
Typical MS-16R1 Builds (Compare 1,041 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16R1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback