Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X670 GAMING X AX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 256%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 112%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 294%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics243% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive371% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X670 GAMING X AX  (all builds)
Memory21.9 GB free of 32 GB
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit renk, 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240110
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateJul 18 '24 at 22:41
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X-$309
AM5, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 75.9
1-Core 203
2-Core 400
117% 226 Pts
4-Core 752
8-Core 1411
129% 1,082 Pts
64-Core 2416
150% 2416 Pts
Poor: 96%
This bench: 108%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti-$750
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 560.70
Performing below potential (60th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
243% Outstanding
Lighting 355
Reflection 336
Parallax 363
290% 351 fps
MRender 479
Gravity 296
Splatting 212
256% 329 fps
Poor: 208%
This bench: 243%
Great: 256%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 2TB-$150
393GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3523 2337 1799 1816 1825 1840 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
371% Outstanding
Read 2,285
Write 3,981
Mixed 3,148
SusWrite 2,190
659% 2,901 MB/s
4K Read 61.4
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 84.2
267% 90.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,688
DQ Write 1,100
DQ Mixed 1,504
1,092% 1,431 MB/s
Poor: 286%
This bench: 371%
Great: 587%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AX5U6400C3216G-BLARWH 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
159% Outstanding
MC Read 60.3
MC Write 55.1
MC Mixed 55.5
163% 57 GB/s
SC Read 51.6
SC Write 63.3
SC Mixed 55.8
163% 56.9 GB/s
Latency 93.3
43% 93.3 ns
Poor: 159%
This bench: 159%
Great: 216%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 200 29.5" 1280 720 AUS303A VG30VQL1A
Typical GA-X670 GAMING X AX Builds (Compare 84 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 397%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 418%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X670 GAMING X AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $2,074
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback