Today's hottest deals

HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics56.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8437
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220421
Uptime3 Days
Run DateAug 19 '24 at 14:51
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$115
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Memory 83.4
1-Core 115
2-Core 230
80% 143 Pts
4-Core 444
8-Core 619
67% 532 Pts
64-Core 582
36% 582 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7600
Sapphire(1DA2 E448) ≥ 4GB; AMD Radeon RX 7600
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.20.30
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.2% Above average
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 180
Parallax 287
0% 156 fps
MRender 218
Gravity 175
Splatting 209
165% 201 fps
Poor: 61%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 138%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
208GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 411040WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 181 261 261 207 208 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Read 478
Write 281
Mixed 215
SusWrite 229
67% 301 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 66.9
4K Mixed 40.4
132% 45.7 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 253
DQ Mixed 187
174% 272 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 111%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$112
357GB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 469 463 469 462 457 462 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 482
Write 467
Mixed 422
SusWrite 464
103% 459 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 73.7
4K Mixed 45.7
149% 51.1 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 345
263% 355 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 110%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G4D32AESBK.M8FE1 Hynix HMA81GU6CJR8N-VK 16GB
2400, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40% Average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 12.5
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 13.5
SC Mixed 10.4
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 83.8
48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 11: 0P 2R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
11% 8% 39 188 13 60 34" 2560 1009 PHLC247 PHL 346E2C
Typical OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx Builds (Compare 3,175 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

System: HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $464
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback