Today's hottest deals

Razer Blade 18 - RZ09-0509

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 119%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics188% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
22 days ago, 16 days ago.
SystemRazer Blade 18 - RZ09-0509  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer KI8100
Memory55.3 GB free of 64 GB
Display3840 x 2400 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2400 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240506
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 05 '24 at 04:49
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-14900HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Memory 79.6
1-Core 228
2-Core 437
128% 248 Pts
4-Core 842
8-Core 1,568
144% 1,205 Pts
64-Core 3,158
195% 3,158 Pts
Poor: 111%
This bench: 119%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090 (Laptop)
Device(1A58 300C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 555.99
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
188% Outstanding
Lighting 238
Reflection 421
Parallax 261
194% 306 fps
MRender 434
Gravity 270
Splatting 218
240% 307 fps
Poor: 144%
This bench: 188%
Great: 243%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme CA6-8D2048 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: ERB0906 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,328
Write 2,298
Mixed 2,024
495% 2,217 MB/s
4K Read 57.9
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 78.1
256% 88.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,187
DQ Write 391
DQ Mixed 886
628% 821 MB/s
Poor: 338% Great: 424%
Nvme CA6-8D2048 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: ERB0906 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,252
Write 2,101
Mixed 1978
471% 2,110 MB/s
4K Read 50.2
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 65.4
216% 74.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,175
DQ Write 389
DQ Mixed 854
611% 806 MB/s
Poor: 338% Great: 424%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R4GA3PB0-CWMOL 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
185% Outstanding
MC Read 75.3
MC Write 73.5
MC Mixed 71.4
210% 73.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 51.3
SC Mixed 31
97% 33.8 GB/s
Latency 83.4
48% 83.4 ns
Poor: 119%
This bench: 185%
Great: 185%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 200 18" 1280 720 SHP15A6 LQ180D1JW01
Typical Blade 18 - RZ09-0509 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 237%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 119%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 292%
UFO

System: Razer Blade 18 - RZ09-0509

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback