Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 117%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive415% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX  (all builds)
Memory22.8 GB free of 32 GB
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240110
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateOct 30 '24 at 16:40
Run Duration278 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X-$268
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Memory 88.1
1-Core 214
2-Core 421
126% 241 Pts
4-Core 777
8-Core 1,342
128% 1,059 Pts
64-Core 1,888
117% 1,888 Pts
Poor: 102%
This bench: 117%
Great: 122%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$170
423GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3186 2216 1687 1673 1692 1694 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
415% Outstanding
Read 2,781
Write 3,337
Mixed 3,021
SusWrite 2,024
630% 2,791 MB/s
4K Read 74.1
4K Write 195
4K Mixed 105
351% 125 MB/s
DQ Read 1,794
DQ Write 1,428
DQ Mixed 1,598
1,200% 1,607 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 415%
Great: 508%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
414GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 494 494 494 494 486 494 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
136% Outstanding
Read 519
Write 493
Mixed 469
SusWrite 493
111% 493 MB/s
4K Read 46.4
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 64.9
222% 80.1 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 370
279% 372 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 136%
Great: 133%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB
4TB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 110 111 108 107 107 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Read 134
Write 160
Mixed 81.8
SusWrite 108
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.7
300% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 94%
WD WD80EMAZ-00WJTA0 8TB
786GB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 135 132 138 146 142 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Read 113
Write 127
Mixed 78.7
SusWrite 139
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.1
286% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 105%
WD easystore 25FB 14TB
2.5TB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 182 186 187 179 180 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 190
Mixed 200
SusWrite 183
261% 190 MB/s
4K Read 10.8
4K Write 8.7
4K Mixed 1.2
377% 6.9 MB/s
DQ Read 0.9
DQ Write 8.7
DQ Mixed 1.8
360% 3.8 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 105%
WD Elements 25A3 14TB
7TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 218 212 214 214 216 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 177
Mixed 148
SusWrite 215
247% 179 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 9.2
4K Mixed 2.3
413% 5.77 MB/s
DQ Read 2.6
DQ Write 9.8
DQ Mixed 2
411% 4.8 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 102%
Great: 103%
ASMT 2235 2TB
655GB free, PID 235c
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 433 435 394 476 466 455 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
287% Outstanding
Read 396
Write 171
Mixed 234
SusWrite 443
407% 311 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 41.4
4K Mixed 31.6
2,571% 32.3 MB/s
DQ Read 27.3
DQ Write 41.6
DQ Mixed 34.9
2,703% 34.6 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 287%
Great: 287%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL TZ/RJ/FL DDR5 6000 C36 2x16GB-$83
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
186% Outstanding
MC Read 58.3
MC Write 73
MC Mixed 71.1
193% 67.5 GB/s
SC Read 56.9
SC Write 67.7
SC Mixed 62.5
178% 62.4 GB/s
Latency 68.3
59% 68.3 ns
Poor: 132%
This bench: 186%
Great: 202%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 67: 0P 5R 10G 12B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
26% 29% 35 63 6 120 0" 3840 2136
History: Score 26: 0P 3R 2G 5B | Score 61: 0P 5R 10G 6B | Score 67: 0P 5R 10G 12B
Typical GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX Builds (Compare 459 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 290%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 296%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $1,729
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback