Lenovo 20091

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemLenovo 20091  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Base Board Product Name
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120621
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '18 at 23:29
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
67.2% Good
Memory 87
1-Core 75.2
2-Core 131
61% 97.7 Pts
4-Core 264
8-Core 340
39% 302 Pts
64-Core 355
22% 355 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 555M
Legend(17AA 3981) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9077
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
3.49% Terrible
Lighting 4.03
Reflection 4.96
Parallax 2.09
3% 3.7 fps
MRender 6.86
Gravity 4.77
Splatting 3.35
4% 4.99 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.49%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor M5M mSATA 256GB-$240
107GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 481
Write 381
Mixed 433
96% 432 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 34.1
4K Mixed 25.5
83% 26.9 MB/s
DQ Read 281
DQ Write 263
DQ Mixed 86.4
116% 210 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 96%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB
565GB free
Firmware: SDM1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 90.5
Write 84.5
Mixed 53.4
56% 76.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.81
4K Write 4.84
4K Mixed 0.29
156% 1.98 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT41GS6MFR8C-PB HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.6% Above average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 17.3
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 14.7
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 70.5
57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20091 Builds (Compare 98 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20091

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $289
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback