ADD TO PC
BUILD

Compulab fit-PC3

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 31% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Compulab fit-PC3 (all builds)
Motherboard	CompuLab fit-PC3
Memory	2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130109
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 18 '18 at 00:45
Run Duration	193 Seconds
Run User	DNK-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD G-T56N 116 User benchmarks, average bench 28% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.65 GHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	30.7% Below average	Memory 54.9 1-Core 19.3 2-Core 40.5 27% 38.2 Pts	4-Core 40.1 8-Core 40.3 5% 40.2 Pts	64-Core 39.8 2% 39.8 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 30.7% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6320 8,182 User benchmarks, average bench 1% AMD(1002 9806) 384MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	1.1% Terrible	Lighting 1.27 Reflection 1.77 Parallax 1.53 1% 1.52 fps	MRender 1.86 Gravity 0.77 Splatting 1.78 1% 1.47 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.1% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow KC300 240GB-$58 2,054 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: 507ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 102 102 5993664 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 -115517440383795 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 970 (0D) Soft read error rate 46 46 -8937820949312 (64) Unknown 0 0 22926 (AA) Unknown 0 0 7808 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 162 (B1) Unknown 0 0 4 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 49 76 68724457521 (C2) HDA temperature 49 76 68724457521 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 5993664 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 102 102 128367982542848 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 5993664 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 5993664 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 0 0 30 (E9) Unknown 0 0 13598 (EA) Unknown 0 0 8554 (F1) Unknown 0 0 8554 (F2) Unknown 0 0 7252	58.9% Above average	Read 466 Write 239 Mixed 271 72% 325 MB/s	4K Read 19.5 4K Write 46.2 4K Mixed 15 73% 26.9 MB/s	DQ Read 105 DQ Write 73 DQ Mixed 47.3 47% 75.1 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 58.9% Great: 94%
SEMC SD CCR-80 16GB 96 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 9GB free, PID e134 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	11.7% Very poor	Read 18.2 Write 11.3 Mixed 13.2 17% 14.2 MB/s	4K Read 3.33 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1.27 120% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 11.7% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 484D543332355336 2x2GB 45 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	14.3% Very poor	MC Read 4.6 MC Write 4.4 MC Mixed 5.4 14% 4.8 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 2.7 SC Mixed 3.6 9% 3.03 GB/s	Latency 144 28% 144 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 14.3% Great: 14%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback