Asus P8B75-M LE

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	7.04% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	54.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8B75-M LE (all builds)
Memory	2.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131209
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Mar 21 '18 at 14:53
Run Duration	361 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	87%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron G550-$49 1,902 User benchmarks, average bench 48% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	37.5% Below average	Memory 58.8 1-Core 51.9 2-Core 78.1 40% 62.9 Pts	4-Core 99.5 8-Core 79.1 12% 89.3 Pts	64-Core 91.3 6% 91.3 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6670 32,193 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Sapphire(174B E194) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	7.04% Terrible	Lighting 8.8 Reflection 8.04 Parallax 7.06 7% 7.97 fps	MRender 8.52 Gravity 6.13 Splatting 9.65 7% 8.1 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.04% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk X110 128GB-$89 11,245 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 8GB free (System drive) Firmware: X231600 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 253 100 6690 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2068 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 22 (A8) Unknown 100 100 441 (A9) Unknown 100 100 206 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 333 (AE) Unknown 100 100 66 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 67 50 214749544481 (D4) Unknown 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 2826 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 43282 (F1) Unknown 253 253 15739 (F2) Unknown 253 253 13998 (F3) Unknown 100 100 0	54.6% Above average	Read 396 Write 207 Mixed 259 63% 287 MB/s	4K Read 21.8 4K Write 49 4K Mixed 16.7 80% 29.2 MB/s	DQ Read 27.9 DQ Write 67.6 DQ Mixed 13.6 20% 36.4 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 89%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 32GB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 140 140 67 (03) Spinup time 135 135 34387591592 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 5773 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 8205 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2475 (C0) Power-off retract count 96 96 5828 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 5828 (C2) HDA temperature 187 187 188979740704 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	75.6% Very good	Read 120 Write 144 Mixed 179 112% 148 MB/s	4K Read 0.55 4K Write 1.78 4K Mixed 0.19 76% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 75.6% Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$78 81,608 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 8GB free Firmware: CC32 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 99 3344 (03) Spinup time 92 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 8696 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 81 60 144201581 (09) Power-on hours count 78 78 19741 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5654 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 91 55835754650 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 52 13423214624 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 252 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 95 95 11135 (C2) HDA temperature 32 48 -140737488355296 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 28 10 3344 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 93991064326136 (F1) Unknown 100 253 3138556841 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1347972639	38.9% Below average	Read 68.3 Write 67.1 Mixed 56 48% 63.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 0.84 4K Mixed 0.29 68% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 75%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33 94,563 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 157 154 5133 (04) Start/Stop count 90 90 10061 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 51 51 36294 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 93 93 7770 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 489 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 197 197 10012 (C2) HDA temperature 113 96 34 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	37.2% Below average	Read 69.8 Write 59.5 Mixed 58.9 47% 62.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 1.82 4K Mixed 0.33 94% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 37.2% Great: 62%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150 16,916 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 180 177 5966 (04) Start/Stop count 90 90 10527 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 60 60 29380 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 6928 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 440 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 181 181 57112 (C2) HDA temperature 116 101 34 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	27.4% Poor	Read 46.9 Write 48.5 Mixed 47 36% 47.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.19 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.17 45% 0.45 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 55%
SanDisk Ultra 32GB 7,719 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 22GB free, PID 5590 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	38.5% Below average	Read 131 Write 58.3 Mixed 79.1 102% 89.4 MB/s	4K Read 5.04 4K Write 1.83 4K Mixed 1.24 123% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 36%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB 31,808 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 6GB free, PID 25a2 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	29.3% Poor	Read 60.9 Write 72 Mixed 55.8 82% 62.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.31 4K Write 1.53 4K Mixed 0.23 61% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 29.3% Great: 63%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 32GB-$28 4,213 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 3GB free, PID 5580 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	73% Very good	Read 235 Write 21 Mixed 22.6 75% 93 MB/s	4K Read 10.9 4K Write 10.3 4K Mixed 4.23 535% 8.5 MB/s	DQ Read 7.64 DQ Write 11.1 DQ Mixed 2.07 476% 6.93 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 93%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173CB0-CK0 2x4GB 1,033 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	27.8% Poor	MC Read 8.5 MC Write 10.6 MC Mixed 10.1 28% 9.73 GB/s	SC Read 7.4 SC Write 7.7 SC Mixed 7.7 22% 7.6 GB/s	Latency 131 30% 131 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 27.8% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8B75-M LE Builds (Compare 579 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M LE

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	103x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	85x
Core i3-3220Intel $79Bench 52%, 71,790 samples	44x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	56x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	33x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	26x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	27x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	26x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	18x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	27x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	21x
Team-Elite-1600 Kingston 9905584-027.A00LF 8GBUnknownBench 53%, 16 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $335

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16