Asus P5K

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	15% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asus P5K (all builds)
Memory	1.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20081014
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Mar 24 '18 at 11:49
Run Duration	219 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100 59,658 User benchmarks, average bench 42% LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	43.3% Average	Memory 68.3 1-Core 27.5 2-Core 55.4 35% 50.4 Pts	4-Core 109 8-Core 108 14% 109 Pts	64-Core 107 7% 107 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 43.3% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152 36,698 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Zotac(19DA 3288) 1GB CLim: 941 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.59 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	15% Very poor	Lighting 17.9 Reflection 16 Parallax 21.9 15% 18.6 fps	MRender 22.3 Gravity 21.9 Splatting 15.6 16% 19.9 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 15% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 150 240GB-$196 15,660 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 35GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFZ12.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 4136 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 181 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 196 196 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 47 (C2) HDA temperature 62 52 206159478822 (F1) Unknown 100 100 198200	38.6% Below average	Read 219 Write 155 Mixed 140 38% 171 MB/s	4K Read 23.5 4K Write 33.9 4K Mixed 8.9 65% 22.1 MB/s	DQ Read 27.1 DQ Write 51.9 DQ Mixed 10.4 16% 29.8 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 95%
Seagate ST3500630AS 500GB-$102 29,256 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 124GB free Firmware: 3.AAK Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 101 87 17337758 (03) Spinup time 92 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6200 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 87 60 495448062 (09) Power-on hours count 83 83 15166 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2131 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 57 37 739311659 (C2) HDA temperature 43 63 64424509483 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 66 55 232044807 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	31.8% Below average	Read 55.3 Write 55 Mixed 26.9 34% 45.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.64 4K Write 1.82 4K Mixed 0.29 93% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 43%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 37GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 32 (03) Spinup time 183 183 6808 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1422 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 11394 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1260 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 290 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 154 154 138041 (C2) HDA temperature 107 84 40 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 1 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 1 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 1	26.1% Poor	Read 46.6 Write 44.3 Mixed 8.69 24% 33.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 0.31 4K Mixed 0.14 42% 0.31 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 26.1% Great: 59%
WDC WD64 00AAKS-00A7B0 640GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 212GB free, PID 2339 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	14.3% Very poor	Read 31 Write 25.2 Mixed 20.4 31% 25.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 1.38 4K Mixed 0.34 60% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.3% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6GB 111,301 User benchmarks, average bench 25% null MHz 1024, 1024, 2048, 2048 MB Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	16.6% Very poor	MC Read 6 MC Write 4.5 MC Mixed 4.8 15% 5.1 GB/s	SC Read 4.9 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 4.9 14% 4.8 GB/s	Latency 106 38% 106 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 16.6% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5K Builds (Compare 360 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5K - $399

CPU
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	91x
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	34x
Core2 Quad Q9650Intel $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples	25x

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	13x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	13x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	12x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	9x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	8x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	153x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	59x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	43x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 46% - Average

Total price: $619

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406