User System

Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	52.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	63% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (77%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	ECT A_M_I
Motherboard	Gigabyte 990FXA-UD3
Memory	10.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130205
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 07 '18 at 11:14
Run Duration	232 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	77%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	66.5% Good	Memory 87.2 1-Core 67.8 2-Core 142 61% 99.1 Pts	4-Core 249 8-Core 375 39% 312 Pts	64-Core 398 25% 398 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 66.5% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Asus(1043 0521) CLim: 1360 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.2.1 Performing below potential (79^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	52.6% Above average	Lighting 65.4 Reflection 68.6 Parallax 82.2 53% 72.1 fps	MRender 70.2 Gravity 63.5 Splatting 56.8 51% 63.5 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB-$251 41,998 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 30GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 8644 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2678 (B1) Unknown 92 92 86 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 75 62 25 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 96 (F1) Unknown 99 99 32604675014	63% Good	Read 486 Write 194 Mixed 121 58% 267 MB/s	4K Read 25.1 4K Write 54.8 4K Mixed 12.6 83% 30.9 MB/s	DQ Read 194 DQ Write 149 DQ Mixed 29.8 61% 125 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 63% Great: 85%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$81 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 3TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 183 176 5850 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4388 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 4589 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1230 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 44 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 197 197 10354 (C2) HDA temperature 128 116 22 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	80.9% Excellent	Read 143 Write 138 Mixed 135 105% 139 MB/s	4K Read 0.85 4K Write 2.47 4K Mixed 0.28 113% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 80.9% Great: 88%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 1TB free Firmware: MX6O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 144 144 21499019691 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2682 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 9863 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2669 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 2708 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 2708 (C2) HDA temperature 240 240 167504642073 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	83.9% Excellent	Read 153 Write 139 Mixed 110 100% 134 MB/s	4K Read 0.76 4K Write 1.66 4K Mixed 0.18 83% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 83.9% Great: 107%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$56 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 930GB free Firmware: AX001A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1692 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 4246 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 4572 (0A) Spinup retry count 184 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1225 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 13511 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 193274380318 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 100 100 107 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 277 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	60.8% Good	Read 108 Write 104 Mixed 26.6 58% 79.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.18 72% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 62%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$39 55,121 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 457GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 175 168 4233 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 8076 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 84 84 11782 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3092 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 110 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 7965 (C2) HDA temperature 107 91 40 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	60.5% Good	Read 108 Write 102 Mixed 36.6 60% 82.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.64 4K Write 1.95 4K Mixed 0.41 108% 1 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 74%
Samsung Portable SSD T3 500GB 191 User benchmarks, average bench 188% 417GB free, PID 61f3 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	165% Outstanding	Read 262 Write 202 Mixed 228 288% 231 MB/s	4K Read 21.4 4K Write 25.4 4K Mixed 14.7 1,442% 20.5 MB/s	DQ Read 24.6 DQ Write 37 DQ Mixed 14.9 1,856% 25.5 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 165% Great: 340%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial ST102464BA160 4x8GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	30.4% Below average	MC Read 10.3 MC Write 9.8 MC Mixed 9 28% 9.7 GB/s	SC Read 10 SC Write 7.1 SC Mixed 9.6 25% 8.9 GB/s	Latency 70.3 57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 30.4% Great: 96%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

User System

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)