Performance Results

Gaming 47%
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation 48%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics43.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive268% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7A21
MotherboardMSI X99A XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM (MS-7A21)  (all builds)
Memory123.2 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160719
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 08 '18 at 20:27
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6950X-$449
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Memory 93.6
1-Core 115
2-Core 225
83% 145 Pts
4-Core 453
8-Core 843
77% 648 Pts
64-Core 1,510
94% 1,510 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 Graphics
AMD(1002 0B0D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1243 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.12
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
43.1% Average
Lighting 51.5
Reflection 63.6
Parallax 78
42% 64.4 fps
MRender 63.8
Gravity 50.9
Splatting 53
45% 55.9 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 45%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
377GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
268% Outstanding
Read 2,061
Write 1,837
Mixed 1,673
414% 1,857 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 86.1
4K Mixed 56.9
173% 59.6 MB/s
DQ Read 451
DQ Write 396
DQ Mixed 207
215% 352 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 268%
Great: 353%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 16GB-$7
4GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
28.1% Poor
Read 119
Write 11
Mixed 19.2
42% 49.6 MB/s
4K Read 6.02
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.37
113% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C14 8x16GB-$1,291
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
135% Outstanding
MC Read 59.2
MC Write 54.1
MC Mixed 47.9
154% 53.7 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 22.4
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 60.7
66% 60.7 ns
Poor: 102%
This bench: 135%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99A XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM (MS-7A21) Builds (Compare 108 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 80%


EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $352
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback