Performance Results


Gaming 79% Battleship	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 87% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	89.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	168% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X299-E GAMING (all builds)
Memory	119.8 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200610
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 26 '20 at 08:24
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-7920X-$250 5,430 User benchmarks, average bench 82% LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	81.8% Excellent	Memory 78.3 1-Core 118 2-Core 240 80% 145 Pts	4-Core 457 8-Core 880 79% 668 Pts	64-Core 1,821 113% 1,821 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 81.8% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% EVGA(3842 6696) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 436.30 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	89.5% Excellent	Lighting 94.9 Reflection 198 Parallax 194 77% 162 fps	MRender 121 Gravity 177 Splatting 121 113% 140 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 89.5% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150 38,097 User benchmarks, average bench 241% 239GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 857 607 595 586 584 576 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	168% Outstanding	Read 1,523 Write 1217 Mixed 670 SusWrite 634 225% 1,011 MB/s	4K Read 32.1 4K Write 104 4K Mixed 48.8 166% 61.6 MB/s	DQ Read 335 DQ Write 414 DQ Mixed 340 266% 363 MB/s
Poor: 157% ↑ This bench: 168% Great: 302%
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$210 25,365 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 954GB free Firmware: EXM03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 438 440 438 436 439 439 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 464 Write 441 Mixed 378 SusWrite 438 97% 430 MB/s	4K Read 30.4 4K Write 78.5 4K Mixed 43 143% 50.6 MB/s	DQ Read 210 DQ Write 338 DQ Mixed 30.9 92% 193 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 124%
Hitachi HMS5C4040BLE640 4TB 902 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 2.5TB free Firmware: MPAOA5D0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 118 118 115 125 117 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	68.4% Good	Read 121 Write 119 Mixed 35.8 SusWrite 117 71% 98.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.6 139% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 68.4% Great: 73%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C14 8x16GB-$1,291 53 User benchmarks, average bench 121% 8 of 8 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	102% Outstanding	MC Read 32.7 MC Write 55.6 MC Mixed 34.3 117% 40.9 GB/s	SC Read 7.8 SC Write 20.2 SC Mixed 10.9 37% 13 GB/s	Latency 83.8 48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 102% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 135%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 103%

UFO

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 104%

UFO

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	81x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	72x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	63x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	54x
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	41x
F4 DDR4 3000 C16 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 85%, 19,774 samples	23x

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $1,343

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16