Asus MAXIMUS IV GENE-Z/GEN3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics53.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS IV GENE-Z/GEN3  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, ,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121109
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 05 '16 at 21:36
Run Duration380 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
78.9% Very good
Memory 91.8
1-Core 101
2-Core 201
76% 131 Pts
4-Core 357
8-Core 516
55% 436 Pts
64-Core 516
32% 516 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 295X2 (CrossFire Disabled)
AMD(1002 0B2A) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 16.150.2211.0
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Lighting 65.8
Reflection 60.2
Parallax 80.8
54% 69 fps
MRender 59.5
Gravity 56.8
Splatting 75.7
54% 64 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 55%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
271GB free
Firmware: 1B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
56.2% Above average
Read 268
Write 212
Mixed 218
52% 233 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 47.4
4K Mixed 20.2
103% 34 MB/s
DQ Read 36
DQ Write 53.6
DQ Mixed 20.5
22% 36.7 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 134%
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.11 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
33.8% Below average
Read 194
Write 83.7
Mixed 94.9
27% 124 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 50.1
4K Mixed 9
66% 26 MB/s
DQ Read 22.3
DQ Write 60.3
DQ Mixed 6.66
15% 29.8 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 61%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
90GB free
Firmware: 1B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Read 56.8
Write 50.6
Mixed 55.3
41% 54.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 0.27
4K Mixed 0.25
52% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 51%
Samsung HD321KJ 320GB-$42
63GB free
Firmware: 0-12 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
18.5% Very poor
Read 53.4
Write 10.8
Mixed 17.7
20% 27.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 0.34
4K Mixed 0.14
39% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 43%
Samsung HD160JJ 160GB-$85
53GB free
Firmware: 0-33 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Read 48.3
Write 10.4
Mixed 17.8
19% 25.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.32
4K Write 0.29
4K Mixed 0.12
32% 0.24 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 33%
Samsung STORY Station 3 1.5TB
165GB free, PID 6053
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Read 29.7
Write 22
Mixed 25.1
32% 25.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 1.32
4K Mixed 0.25
55% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.7% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 15.3
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 16.8
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 64.4
62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS IV GENE-Z/GEN3 Builds (Compare 244 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IV GENE-Z/GEN3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $737
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback