HP OMEN by HP Laptop 17-an0xx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics25.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Laptop 17-an0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8394
Memory7.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 11 '18 at 21:44
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Memory 84.5
1-Core 117
2-Core 226
80% 142 Pts
4-Core 410
8-Core 603
63% 506 Pts
64-Core 603
37% 603 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
HP(103C 8394) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 1650 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.5.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.7% Poor
Lighting 32.5
Reflection 30.3
Parallax 39.2
26% 34 fps
MRender 33.2
Gravity 30.9
Splatting 26
24% 30 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 500GB
235GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT21B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 7,900
Write 5,266
Mixed 5,868
1,406% 6,345 MB/s
4K Read 665
4K Write 252
4K Mixed 333
1,568% 417 MB/s
DQ Read 1,439
DQ Write 868
DQ Mixed 927
751% 1,078 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 126%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79
1.5TB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 123 125 127 124 118 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 78.6
Write 109
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 122
67% 91.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.2
223% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 68%
HGST HTS721010A9 1TB
931GB free, PID 1066
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 129 129 131 130 130 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Read 126
Write 120
Mixed 31.9
SusWrite 129
134% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
58.4% Above average
MC Read 22.7
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 15.9
58% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 18.7
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Laptop 17-an0xx Builds (Compare 1,458 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop 17-an0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback