Asus P8B75-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics21.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8B75-M  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140806
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 09 '18 at 10:52
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3220-$60
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64.9% Good
Memory 91
1-Core 76.8
2-Core 156
65% 108 Pts
4-Core 226
8-Core 230
30% 228 Pts
64-Core 233
14% 233 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174
PwrHis(1787 2320) 2GB
CLim: 860 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.5.1
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
21.4% Poor
Lighting 25.9
Reflection 27.7
Parallax 30.8
21% 28.1 fps
MRender 24.6
Gravity 20.6
Splatting 32.7
22% 25.9 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD VelociRaptor 500GB-$62
436GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 04.06A00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 148 146 166 180 179 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
99% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 173
Mixed 135
SusWrite 162
121% 163 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
178% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 99%
Great: 113%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 32GB-$28
22GB free, PID 5580
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 41 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
47.9% Average
Read 39.5
Write 41.4
Mixed 35.2
SusWrite 41.4
54% 39.4 MB/s
4K Read 9
4K Write 10.1
4K Mixed 7
615% 8.7 MB/s
DQ Read 9.8
DQ Write 10.7
DQ Mixed 9
706% 9.83 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMV4GX3M1A1600C11 Transcend JM1333KLN-4G 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.9% Above average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 16
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8B75-M Builds (Compare 1,515 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M - $470

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $902
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback