Gigabyte GA-Z87M-D3HP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z87M-D3HP  (all builds)
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130523
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateNov 16 '18 at 18:14
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670-$52
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Memory 87
1-Core 107
2-Core 201
76% 132 Pts
4-Core 420
8-Core 380
54% 400 Pts
64-Core 396
24% 396 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
Gigabyte(1458 3544) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
3.48% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 5
Parallax 3.78
4% 4.36 fps
MRender 5.76
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 3.09
3% 4.38 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.48%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS120G2G0A- 120GB
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 24 17 38 1.5 47 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 452
Write 104
Mixed 127
SusWrite 31.8
39% 179 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 24
4K Mixed 12.9
52% 17.3 MB/s
DQ Read 87.4
DQ Write 38.8
DQ Mixed 8.2
21% 44.8 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 51%
WDC WD20 03FZEX-00Z4SA0 2TB
2TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 10 10 10 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
8.04% Terrible
Read 26.4
Write 21.1
Mixed 20.8
SusWrite 10.1
25% 19.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
40% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.04%
Great: 54%
Generic Flash Disk 16GB
14GB free, PID 0233
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.3 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
3.42% Terrible
Read 12
Write 3.2
Mixed 6.3
SusWrite 5.1
8% 6.65 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
9% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.42%
Great: 6%
Seagate Expansion 3TB
1TB free, PID 231a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 9.8 9.9 9.8 9.8 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
7.28% Terrible
Read 11.5
Write 11.8
Mixed 11.5
SusWrite 9.9
15% 11.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.4
52% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 7.28%
Great: 57%
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 120GB
34GB free, PID a001
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
29.9% Poor
Read 22.2
Write 19.5
Mixed 20.8
SusWrite 11.5
24% 18.5 MB/s
4K Read 7.5
4K Write 7.3
4K Mixed 7.2
521% 7.33 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 200%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-809.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
60.8% Good
MC Read 22.2
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 18.6
60% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 19.5
53% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 70.5
57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z87M-D3HP Builds (Compare 38 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z87M-D3HP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $90
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback