Toshiba SATELLITE C850D-11F

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemToshiba SATELLITE C850D-11F  (all builds)
MotherboardAMD PLCBX8
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121212
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateDec 17 '18 at 11:46
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E1-1200 APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
24.9% Poor
Memory 45
1-Core 15.8
2-Core 31.5
22% 30.8 Pts
4-Core 30.2
8-Core 30.4
4% 30.3 Pts
64-Core 30.7
2% 30.7 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7310
Toshiba(1179 FB33) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
0.35% Terrible
Lighting 0.07
Reflection 1.38
Parallax 1.28
0% 0.91 fps
MRender 1.29
Gravity 0.63
Splatting 1.39
1% 1.1 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.35%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD032 320GB-$50
236GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX003M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 75 71 69 74 75 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
45% Average
Read 84.5
Write 81.3
Mixed 31.1
SusWrite 72.2
49% 67.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 45%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Asint SSA302G08-EDJ1C 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 667 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11.7% Very poor
MC Read 3.9
MC Write 3.2
MC Mixed 4.6
11% 3.9 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 2.5
SC Mixed 2.6
8% 2.63 GB/s
Latency 180
22% 180 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SATELLITE C850D-11F Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE C850D-11F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback