Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive353% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 1  (all builds)
Memory59.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 19 '19 at 14:13
Run Duration301 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$229
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
97.3% Outstanding
Memory 94.7
1-Core 147
2-Core 292
98% 178 Pts
4-Core 538
8-Core 794
83% 666 Pts
64-Core 801
50% 801 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.71
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
104% Outstanding
Lighting 135
Reflection 144
Parallax 123
110% 134 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 132
Splatting 107
95% 117 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 104%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$300
618GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2058 2119 2220 2284 2285 2280 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
353% Outstanding
Read 2,567
Write 2,364
Mixed 1,113
SusWrite 2,208
463% 2,063 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 75.8
229% 86.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,061
DQ Write 863
DQ Mixed 968
723% 964 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 353%
Great: 425%
Toshiba HG5d Q Series 256GB-$225
66GB free
Firmware: HTGAN102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 469 472 176 206 128 154 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
Read 484
Write 451
Mixed 425
SusWrite 268
91% 407 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 89.2
4K Mixed 44
144% 53.4 MB/s
DQ Read 361
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 297
236% 329 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 106%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$113
237GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 486 489 484 492 478 448 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 482
Mixed 327
SusWrite 479
100% 445 MB/s
4K Read 43.6
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 54.9
195% 70 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 334
259% 354 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 126%
Great: 124%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 132 136 138 137 137 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Read 113
Write 114
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 133
70% 97 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 83%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 100 100 100 99 98 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
56% Above average
Read 96
Write 63.7
Mixed 52.5
SusWrite 98.5
57% 77.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
186% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 56%
Great: 83%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00MMMB0 3TB
3TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 81 80 80 79 41 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
32.4% Below average
Read 81.5
Write 69.2
Mixed 49
SusWrite 68.4
88% 67 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
85% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 44%
WDC WD10 03FBYZ-010FB0 1TB
543GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.9% Very poor
Read 66
Write 68.3
Mixed 52.2
SusWrite 0.1
59% 46.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 47%
ST310005 28AS 1TB
489GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Read 68.2
Write 81.3
Mixed 54.8
SusWrite 0.2
66% 51.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 40%
ST310005 28AS 1TB
697GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 81 80 80 76 2.9 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
25.1% Poor
Read 70.5
Write 76
Mixed 52
SusWrite 56.4
86% 63.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
46% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 40%
ST375063 0AS 750GB
362GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 30 26 23 23 22 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
10.3% Very poor
Read 28.8
Write 19.5
Mixed 12
SusWrite 25.1
28% 21.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.2
14% 0.2 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMU64GX4M4C3200C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
MC Read 34.7
MC Write 37.2
MC Mixed 29.8
97% 33.9 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 41.5
SC Mixed 30.5
89% 31.2 GB/s
Latency 57.9
69% 57.9 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 813 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1 - $131

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 110% - Outstanding Total price: $696
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback