bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics87.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
System
MotherboardIntel DZ68BC
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121018
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 27 '19 at 05:11
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 31%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$50
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
77.1% Very good
Memory 90.8
1-Core 99
2-Core 197
75% 129 Pts
4-Core 376
8-Core 324
48% 350 Pts
64-Core 374
23% 374 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.71
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 115
Parallax 109
90% 111 fps
MRender 98.1
Gravity 103
Splatting 102
83% 101 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,246
Write 64.8
Mixed 127
308% 1,479 MB/s
4K Read 505
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 7.9
777% 172 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
OCZ Agility 3 240GB-$199
144GB free
Firmware: 2.22
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 165
Write 201
Mixed 172
40% 179 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 49.2
4K Mixed 27.5
95% 33 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 151
124% 176 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 66%
WD Green 500GB (2012)
127GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3904
Write 40.3
Mixed 80.8
962% 1,342 MB/s
4K Read 444
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1.6
18,700% 149 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 08G-D3-1600-MR BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 08G-D3-1600-MR 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
57.6% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 18.1
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 17.7
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,515 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback