PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 53.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 33.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus Rampage III GENE (all builds) |
Memory | 9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110920 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Feb 03 '19 at 19:39 |
Run Duration | 391 Seconds |
Run User | FRA-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
60.1%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX 580-$131
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.1.1
|
53.6%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 74 65 67 66 83 MB/s
|
33.2%
Below average
|
|||
46.2%
Average
|
||||
WD VelociRaptor 1TB-$268
302GB free
Firmware: 04.06A00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 81 76 83 92 96 MB/s
|
67.6%
Good
|
|||
Seagate IronWolf 12TB (2017)-$120
3TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 77 80 69 66 66 MB/s
|
||||
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$110
129GB free
Firmware: AR13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 116 122 120 121 128 MB/s
|
||||
Seagate IronWolf 12TB (2017)-$120
2.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 146 158 159 163 164 MB/s
|
||||
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$110
699GB free
Firmware: AR13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 103 100 95 108 101 MB/s
|
||||
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$110
342GB free
Firmware: AR17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 77 80 69 65 65 MB/s
|
||||
WDC WD40 EFRX-68WT0N0 4TB
227GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 80 81 79 82 84 MB/s
|
42.4%
Average
|
|||
ST4000DM 000-1F2168 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 21 20 21 21 MB/s
|
25.5%
Poor
|
|||
ST4000DM000-1F21 4TB
576GB free, PID 1068
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 43 43 43 44 MB/s
|
20.3%
Poor
|
|||
ST10000V N0004-1ZD101 10TB
2.5TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 21 20 21 24 MB/s
|
51%
Above average
|
|||
WD My Book 1140 4TB
476GB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 24 24 24 24 MB/s
|
17.1%
Very poor
|
|||
HP ENVY 7640 series 32GB
29GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 11 10 11 11 11 MB/s
|
||||
WDC WD40 EZRX-00SPEB0 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 21 21 20 21 26 MB/s
|
28.8%
Poor
|
|||
WDC WD40 EZRX-00SPEB0 4TB
72GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 21 21 20 20 29 MB/s
|
27.1%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 6 slots used
16GB DIMM
|
32.9%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples | 109x |
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples | 54x |
Xeon X5650IntelBench 70%, 13,757 samples | 26x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 29x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 28x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 19x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Very good | Total price: $211 |