bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory3.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160405
Uptime7 Days
Run DateMar 26 '19 at 10:57
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
CPU #000, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.7% Below average
Memory 45.2
1-Core 30.8
2-Core 69.9
30% 48.6 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 223
27% 208 Pts
64-Core 256
16% 256 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Vmware SVGA 3D
Vmware(15AD 0405) 256MB
Driver: vm3dum64_loader.dll Ver. 8.16.1.0
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.06% Terrible
Lighting 0.07
Reflection 0.08
Parallax 0.06
0% 0.07 fps
MRender 0.1
Gravity 0.07
Splatting 0.09
0% 0.08 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 0.06%
Great: 69%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 56GB
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 24 13 21 20 34 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
46.1% Average
Read 135
Write 47.8
Mixed 92.5
SusWrite 24.3
56% 74.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 2.9
498% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 55%
Vmware Virtual disk 6GB
4GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 36 17 27 31 50 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.2% Below average
Read 77.2
Write 53.7
Mixed 64.7
SusWrite 33.5
43% 57.3 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 3.4
540% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 57%
Vmware Virtual disk 16GB
14GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 70 35 56 63 107 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
0, 0 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
66.5% Good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 29.2
MC Mixed 27.3
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 8.1
SC Mixed 8.5
21% 7.33 GB/s
Latency 180
22% 180 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,554 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback