HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1494
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111110
Uptime2 Days
Run DateNov 11 '19 at 05:21
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Memory 92.4
1-Core 95.3
2-Core 186
74% 125 Pts
4-Core 351
8-Core 353
47% 352 Pts
64-Core 357
22% 357 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 53 49 61 59 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 77.4
Write 81.2
Mixed 47.5
SusWrite 56.1
48% 65.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 57%
Seagate BUP Slim SL 2TB
277GB free
Firmware: 0108
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 12 12 12 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Read 27.2
Write 19.2
Mixed 22.9
SusWrite 11.8
15% 20.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.6
178% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 65%
TOSHIBA MK4032GAX 40GB
22GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 10 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
6.24% Terrible
Read 15.7
Write 13.4
Mixed 12.2
SusWrite 10.7
17% 13 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.2
25% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.24%
Great: 16%
USB 3.0 super high speed 160GB
134GB free, PID 0711
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Read 27
Write 19.6
Mixed 19.2
SusWrite 10.8
24% 19.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G4M1 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
52.6% Above average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 16.6
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 16
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 63.3
63% 63.3 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC Builds (Compare 1,780 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $278
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback