Asus RAMPAGE IV FORMULA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive96% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE IV FORMULA  (all builds)
Memory18.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141205
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 19 '19 at 22:18
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4820K-$110
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Memory 96.7
1-Core 120
2-Core 253
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 414
8-Core 615
64% 514 Pts
64-Core 624
39% 624 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 118 111 99 97 73 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
96% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 490
Mixed 314
SusWrite 117
79% 355 MB/s
4K Read 40.4
4K Write 86.1
4K Mixed 49
170% 58.5 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 182
186% 303 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 96%
Great: 108%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
74GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,608
Write 2,279
Mixed 1,840
499% 2,243 MB/s
4K Read 67.1
4K Write 154
4K Mixed 90.5
299% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 955
DQ Write 721
DQ Mixed 817
617% 831 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 346%
Synology iSCSI Storage 1.5TB
751GB free
Firmware: 4.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 223 190 189 174 176 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 200
Write 526
Mixed 310
SusWrite 204
71% 310 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 29.9
4K Mixed 30.5
100% 30.1 MB/s
DQ Read 90.5
DQ Write 127
DQ Mixed 112
84% 110 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 2133 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
MC Read 34.9
MC Write 33.8
MC Mixed 32.9
97% 33.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 15.2
49% 17 GB/s
Latency 51.5
78% 51.5 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE IV FORMULA Builds (Compare 580 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE IV FORMULA - $714

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $1,300
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback