Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics81% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive235% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI  (all builds)
Memory57.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190506
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 02 '20 at 13:45
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$180
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
56.7% Above average
Memory 60.9
1-Core 64.7
2-Core 131
50% 85.4 Pts
4-Core 282
8-Core 552
49% 417 Pts
64-Core 1,113
69% 1,113 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81% Excellent
Lighting 88.2
Reflection 124
Parallax 125
72% 112 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 140
Splatting 110
99% 122 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 81%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$198
871GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1427 1239 1243 1194 1157 1156 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
235% Outstanding
Read 1,865
Write 1,728
Mixed 774
SusWrite 1236
313% 1,401 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 96.9
4K Mixed 53.7
175% 62.2 MB/s
DQ Read 757
DQ Write 588
DQ Mixed 695
514% 680 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 235%
Great: 302%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$198
825GB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1097 1102 1098 1103 1102 1093 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
205% Outstanding
Read 1,244
Write 1,094
Mixed 803
SusWrite 1,099
238% 1,060 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 93.4
4K Mixed 52.5
170% 60.3 MB/s
DQ Read 844
DQ Write 750
DQ Mixed 773
586% 789 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 205%
Great: 302%
CT2000BX500SSD1 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 435 440 439 171 31 31 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
85% Excellent
Read 491
Write 434
Mixed 407
SusWrite 258
89% 397 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 95.8
4K Mixed 27.7
129% 50.6 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 40.7
90% 178 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 85%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMR32GX4M2C3333C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
67.3% Good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 25.1
MC Mixed 24.3
73% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 13.7
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 151%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 871 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI - $475

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $997
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback