Asus A88XM-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus A88XM-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151103
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 31 '17 at 11:24
Run Duration780 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7890K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$889
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Memory 52
1-Core 50.4
2-Core 96
40% 66.1 Pts
4-Core 138
8-Core 142
19% 140 Pts
64-Core 200
12% 200 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Asus(1043 85CB) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 16.12.2
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.49% Terrible
Lighting 1.47
Reflection 1.54
Parallax 2.31
1% 1.77 fps
MRender 2.19
Gravity 3.7
Splatting 1.87
2% 2.59 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 1.49%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$28
514GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Read 171
Write 142
Mixed 124
109% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.26
4K Mixed 0.31
78% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 113%
Generic Flash Disk 4GB
2GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
2.73% Terrible
Read 13.8
Write 1.18
Mixed 2.16
5% 5.72 MB/s
4K Read 1.84
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.01
8% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.73%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD3-2133 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
MC Read 4.4
MC Write 2.7
MC Mixed 3.3
10% 3.47 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 3
SC Mixed 3.5
10% 3.5 GB/s
Latency 153
26% 153 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A88XM-PLUS Builds (Compare 257 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A88XM-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 25% - Poor Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback