Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics19.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
System
MotherboardIntel DH67CL
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181023
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 23 '20 at 14:00
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75% Very good
Memory 89.2
1-Core 92.7
2-Core 182
71% 121 Pts
4-Core 353
8-Core 354
47% 354 Pts
64-Core 351
22% 351 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 75%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760 (192-bit)
Nvidia(10DE 106F) 1.5GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 440.97
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Lighting 21.2
Reflection 22.5
Parallax 23.1
17% 22.3 fps
MRender 33.4
Gravity 28.1
Splatting 24.3
23% 28.6 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 22%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Generic S300 Hard drive 3TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: MX6OABT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 114 129 132 108 135 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
66% Good
Read 110
Write 142
Mixed 38.8
SusWrite 120
74% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.2
71% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 66%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF KVT8FP-HYC 8GB
1333, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.7% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 9.3
MC Mixed 8.3
25% 8.87 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 9.1
26% 9.1 GB/s
Latency 68.3
59% 68.3 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,915 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback