Acer Aspire A315-41

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive38.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Aspire A315-41  (all builds)
MotherboardRR Metapod_RR
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200618
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 11 '20 at 18:57
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
65.6% Good
Memory 71
1-Core 109
2-Core 186
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 432
49% 382 Pts
64-Core 434
27% 434 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics
Acer(1025 1259) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.20.36
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Lighting 14.2
Reflection 13
Parallax 18.8
12% 15.3 fps
MRender 12.5
Gravity 15.7
Splatting 16.3
12% 14.9 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 12%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GJ 128GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 49 40 29 27 22 MB/s
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.6% Below average
Read 63.4
Write 240
Mixed 36.3
SusWrite 42.4
22% 95.5 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 48
4K Mixed 23
88% 31 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 22.4
52% 105 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 78%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
679GB free
Firmware: JU001J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 125 125 125 125 125 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Read 139
Write 144
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 125
84% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 0.6
231% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 CT8G4SFS824A.C8FE 16GB
2667, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
82.9% Excellent
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 32.5
MC Mixed 27.8
86% 30.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 32.6
SC Mixed 22.4
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 99.2
40% 99.2 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire A315-41 Builds (Compare 460 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A315-41

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback