ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP ENVY x360 Convertible 15-cp0xxx

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 33% Sail boat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	4.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	59.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP ENVY x360 Convertible 15-cp0xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8497
Memory	3.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191115
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 11 '21 at 03:04
Run Duration	212 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U 8,291 User benchmarks, average bench 52% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	31.7% Below average	Memory 21.9 1-Core 59.6 2-Core 99.1 32% 60.2 Pts	4-Core 223 8-Core 326 34% 274 Pts	64-Core 470 29% 470 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics 4,933 User benchmarks, average bench 10% HP(103C 8497) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.10.08.06 Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	4.78% Terrible	Lighting 4.2 Reflection 5.5 Parallax 8.9 3% 6.2 fps	MRender 8.6 Gravity 6.9 Splatting 10.9 7% 8.8 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 4.78% Great: 12%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1006 256GB 17,295 User benchmarks, average bench 152% 91GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20110006 SusWrite @10s intervals: 256 237 216 213 203 204 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	59.3% Above average	Read 313 Write 235 Mixed 274 SusWrite 222 58% 261 MB/s	4K Read 15.9 4K Write 35.9 4K Mixed 21.8 71% 24.5 MB/s	DQ Read 304 DQ Write 195 DQ Mixed 284 202% 261 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 59.3% Great: 197%
Seagate BUP Slim 2TB 10,173 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 916GB free Firmware: 1707 SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 111 111 109 109 108 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	53.5% Above average	Read 76.6 Write 104 Mixed 71.9 SusWrite 110 67% 90.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 120% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 70%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 32GB 1,150 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 18GB free, PID 00d4 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 5.5 17 11 11 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	5.46% Terrible	Read 16.8 Write 26.8 Mixed 7 SusWrite 10.1 20% 15.2 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.6 32% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 5.46% Great: 11%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 CT8G4SFS824A.C8FE 16GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	50.4% Above average	MC Read 7.4 MC Write 27.8 MC Mixed 26.1 58% 20.4 GB/s	SC Read 8 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 7.1 21% 7.23 GB/s	Latency 307 13% 307 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 83%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical ENVY x360 Convertible 15-cp0xxx Builds (Compare 137 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 55%

Yacht

Workstation

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: HP ENVY x360 Convertible 15-cp0xxx

CPU
Ryzen 5 2500UAMDBench 49%, 61,910 samples	105x
Ryzen 7 2700UAMDBench 52%, 8,291 samples	20x
Ryzen 3 2300UAMDBench 55%, 3,165 samples	12x

GPU
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)AMDBench 10%, 85,536 samples	105x
Radeon RX Vega 10 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 4,933 samples	20x
RX Vega 6 (Ryzen iGPU)AMDBench 8%, 2,318 samples	12x

SSD
MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 174%, 20,171 samples	19x
MZNLN128HAHQ-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 78%, 14,590 samples	12x
TOSHIBA 256GBKbg30zmv256gBench 99%, 31,797 samples	9x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	21x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GBSamsungBench 60%, 54,777 samples	9x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback