Today's hottest deals

Asrock Z270 Gaming K6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics84.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive32.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock Z270 Gaming K6  (all builds)
Memory27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180226
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 23 '20 at 17:14
Run Duration224 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$178
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Memory 94.8
1-Core 130
2-Core 251
90% 159 Pts
4-Core 454
8-Core 706
72% 580 Pts
64-Core 682
42% 682 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$140
Gigabyte(1458 3FC1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3595 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
84.7% Excellent
Lighting 107
Reflection 111
Parallax 105
87% 108 fps
MRender 134
Gravity 97.2
Splatting 74.9
80% 102 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$39
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE30
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.2 14 4.1 22 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Read 323
Write 78.1
Mixed 87.7
SusWrite 14.5
27% 126 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 23.9
4K Mixed 8
54% 17.4 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 30.9
DQ Mixed 26.6
32% 57.1 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 53%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$80
399GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2229 839 831 828 826 833 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
310% Outstanding
Read 2,471
Write 2,379
Mixed 1,453
SusWrite 1,064
412% 1,842 MB/s
4K Read 67.7
4K Write 157
4K Mixed 91.3
303% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 1,316
DQ Write 1,017
DQ Mixed 1,135
858% 1,156 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 310%
Great: 346%
OCZ AGILITY3 60GB
54GB free
Firmware: 2.06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 54 55 55 56 54 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 142
Write 60.5
Mixed 84.9
SusWrite 54.9
19% 85.5 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 58.4
4K Mixed 29.2
109% 38.1 MB/s
DQ Read 75.9
DQ Write 60.3
DQ Mixed 66.4
50% 67.5 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 51%
WD Green 5TB (2014)-$170
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 89 87 91 90 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 81
Write 78.4
Mixed 64
SusWrite 88.3
58% 77.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
187% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 37.8
MC Write 40.6
MC Mixed 29.6
103% 36 GB/s
SC Read 22
SC Write 44.4
SC Mixed 32.9
95% 33.1 GB/s
Latency 57.7
69% 57.7 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 102%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270 Gaming K6 Builds (Compare 703 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asrock Z270 Gaming K6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $546
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback