Today's hottest deals

MSI Z170A GAMING PRO (MS-7984)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics10.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7984
MotherboardMSI Z170A GAMING PRO (MS-7984)  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display4096x2160x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180616
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateNov 10 '20 at 16:28
Run Duration304 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600-$246
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Memory 89.6
1-Core 121
2-Core 237
84% 149 Pts
4-Core 466
8-Core 433
61% 449 Pts
64-Core 429
27% 429 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
MSI(1462 8C98) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Lighting 19.6
Reflection 15.5
Parallax 18.6
16% 17.9 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
384GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 349 366 364 368 339 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 455
Write 362
Mixed 296
SusWrite 355
82% 367 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 45.9
172% 66.5 MB/s
DQ Read 361
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 245
206% 300 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 107%
Great: 129%
Hitachi HDN726040ALE614 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: APGNW7JH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 172 170 174 174 168 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 193
Mixed 80.7
SusWrite 172
116% 159 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
178% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 104%
Great: 113%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$70
33GB free
Firmware: 0005DEM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 96 97 98 98 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 103
Write 104
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 96.9
66% 90.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
105% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 62%
Samsung HD160HJ 160GB
0GB free
Firmware: BF100-11
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 64.6
Write 75.8
Mixed 46.2
46% 62.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 42%
Intenso External USB 3.0 3TB
33GB free
Firmware: 5438
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 129 131 132 133 131 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
78.7% Very good
Read 143
Write 121
Mixed 101
SusWrite 131
92% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 93%
Intenso External USB 3.0 3TB
473GB free
Firmware: 5438
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 111 115 117 115 117 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
77.4% Very good
Read 152
Write 180
Mixed 146
SusWrite 115
110% 148 MB/s
4K Read 7.2
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.8
461% 3.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 93%
HGST HDN 726040ALE614 4TB
563GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 2.3 0.4 0 0.1 15 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 212
Write 217
Mixed 92.5
SusWrite 3.6
161% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 0.8
208% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 84%
TOSHIBA DT01ABA300 3TB
14GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 99 109 101 105 101 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.4% Above average
Read 150
Write 146
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 102
140% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 57%
TOSHIBA HDWQ140 4TB
2TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 98 109 101 105 100 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.4% Above average
Read 172
Write 174
Mixed 97.1
SusWrite 102
178% 136 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1.1
154% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 63%
TOSHIBA DT01ABA300 3TB
50GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 4.1 0.5 0.1 0.1 18 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
16.6% Very poor
Read 70.5
Write 68.7
Mixed 19.2
SusWrite 4.5
49% 40.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
81% 1 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 57%
Toshiba StorE HDD 500GB
37GB free, PID 0b16
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 38 38 38 38 37 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
23.5% Poor
Read 40.3
Write 37.5
Mixed 33
SusWrite 37.8
50% 37.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.1
142% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 21%
TOSHIBA HDWQ140 4TB
368GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 102 98 108 104 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
44.7% Average
Read 125
Write 160
Mixed 66
SusWrite 102
152% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.4
64% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 62%
TOSHIBA HDWQ140 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 102 98 108 104 100 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
60% Good
Read 187
Write 188
Mixed 94.6
SusWrite 102
185% 143 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1.1
159% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 60%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-2400C17-4GIS 8313 CL15-15-15 D4-2400 04CD F4-2400C17-4GIS 8313 CL15-15-15 D4-2400 16GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
77.1% Very good
MC Read 27.4
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 25.4
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 28.4
SC Mixed 22.5
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 67.7
59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170A GAMING PRO (MS-7984) Builds (Compare 1,278 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI Z170A GAMING PRO (MS-7984) - $174

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $683
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $240Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback