Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 125%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics135% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive382% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory58.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190424
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 19 '21 at 06:41
Run Duration326 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$175
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
92% Outstanding
Memory 86
1-Core 140
2-Core 279
92% 168 Pts
4-Core 526
8-Core 871
85% 699 Pts
64-Core 1,121
69% 1,121 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 92%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$400
Asus(1043 87C8) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
135% Outstanding
Lighting 190
Reflection 181
Parallax 173
155% 181 fps
MRender 193
Gravity 144
Splatting 121
121% 153 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 135%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$265
649GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2282 2243 2302 2384 2216 2042 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
382% Outstanding
Read 2,672
Write 2,407
Mixed 1,221
SusWrite 2,245
479% 2,136 MB/s
4K Read 56.7
4K Write 190
4K Mixed 84.2
294% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1,008
DQ Write 1,108
DQ Mixed 1,047
791% 1,054 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 382%
Great: 425%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 966GB
900GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 433 435 435 430 431 430 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 444
Mixed 387
SusWrite 432
99% 439 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 93.6
4K Mixed 45.6
159% 57.5 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 287
DQ Mixed 332
247% 329 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 110%
Great: 129%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB
1TB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 461 463 463 458 461 459 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 478
Write 476
Mixed 436
SusWrite 461
104% 463 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 55.8
188% 66.1 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 354
267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 122%
Great: 122%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 1GB
1GB free
Firmware: 0.1
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 496
Write 465
Mixed 398
101% 453 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 96.7
4K Mixed 46.2
161% 58.8 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 342
257% 343 MB/s
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$200
912GB free
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1709 1723 1480 1166 1168 1167 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
302% Outstanding
Read 2,006
Write 1,627
Mixed 1,015
SusWrite 1,402
338% 1,513 MB/s
4K Read 47.7
4K Write 178
4K Mixed 68.9
255% 98.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,366
DQ Write 1,229
DQ Mixed 1,035
848% 1,210 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 302%
Great: 302%
Seagate ST8000VN004-2M2101 8TB
7TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 245 246 247 250 248 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 18% Great: 117%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C15 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.5% Very good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 23.7
75% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 31.3
SC Mixed 24.9
71% 24.9 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING Builds (Compare 7,933 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING - $477

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 110% - Outstanding Total price: $1,019
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback