Huananzhi X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive79.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardHuananzhi X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset  (all builds)
Memory29.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180424
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 07 '21 at 06:16
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
69.1% Good
Memory 78.3
1-Core 57.7
2-Core 144
56% 93.4 Pts
4-Core 322
8-Core 623
56% 473 Pts
64-Core 842
52% 842 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
m.2 Smartbuy PS5013-2280T 128GB
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFM00E2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 119 150 149 148 149 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Read 584
Write 40.4
Mixed 221
SusWrite 144
54% 248 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 80.9
4K Mixed 28.4
128% 47.1 MB/s
DQ Read 241
DQ Write 148
DQ Mixed 183
139% 191 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 197%
Seagate ST9250315AS 250GB-$30
22GB free
Firmware: 0003SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 68 67 67 66 63 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
37.4% Below average
Read 64
Write 57.2
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 66.2
41% 56.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 43%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
312GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 93 90 93 91 93 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 73.2
Write 90.2
Mixed 50.9
SusWrite 91.6
56% 76.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.4
76% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0- 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
97% Outstanding
MC Read 42.9
MC Write 37
MC Mixed 37.2
112% 39 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 10.4
SC Mixed 10.7
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 83.7
48% 83.7 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 97%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset Builds (Compare 448 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Huananzhi X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback