Gigabyte GA-Z77X-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics30.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z77X-D3H  (all builds)
Memory21.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121024
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 26 '21 at 14:12
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3470 CPU @ 3.20GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Memory 88.7
1-Core 65.3
2-Core 194
66% 116 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 355
50% 366 Pts
64-Core 363
22% 363 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280-$185
CLim: 940 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
30.8% Below average
Lighting 41.2
Reflection 31.3
Parallax 53.1
34% 41.9 fps
MRender 30.5
Gravity 41.6
Splatting 23.8
25% 32 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 34%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
350GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 201 161 162 160 159 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
66.4% Good
Read 333
Write 234
Mixed 269
SusWrite 180
57% 254 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 47.8
4K Mixed 35.5
115% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 137
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 141
105% 140 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
440GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 195 193 196 195 191 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Read 120
Write 93
Mixed 66.8
SusWrite 193
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 113%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
46GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 88 90 90 91 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
43.9% Average
Read 62.9
Write 51.9
Mixed 39.1
SusWrite 90.1
45% 61 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
139% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 83%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
7GB free
Firmware: CC52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 147 147 148 151 148 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Read 122
Write 99.9
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 148
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
114% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 96%
Hitachi HDS5C3030BLE630 3TB
3TB free
Firmware: MZ6OAAB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 34 37 36 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 142
Write 34.3
Mixed 50.2
SusWrite 35.9
48% 65.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
107% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-14900CL10-8GBXL Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
49.3% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 14.9
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 14.4
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z77X-D3H Builds (Compare 1,658 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z77X-D3H - $333

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $555
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback