Asus H97-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics43.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus H97-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory18.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141009
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 06 '21 at 09:14
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 65%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Memory 82.1
1-Core 91
2-Core 196
70% 123 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 337
45% 338 Pts
64-Core 348
22% 348 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
43.5% Average
Lighting 56.5
Reflection 56.3
Parallax 49.9
46% 54.2 fps
MRender 43
Gravity 51.8
Splatting 46.8
39% 47.2 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 133 129 126 120 117 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Read 461
Write 432
Mixed 356
SusWrite 148
78% 349 MB/s
4K Read 38.3
4K Write 94.3
4K Mixed 46.4
167% 59.7 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 358
269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
54GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 139 139 139 138 140 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Read 113
Write 114
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 138
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
217% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
388GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 207 206 205 206 207 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 154
Write 112
Mixed 80.4
SusWrite 202
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 102%
Great: 114%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$132
329GB free
Firmware: FP1R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 103 105 103 103 105 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
69.8% Good
Read 139
Write 140
Mixed 62
SusWrite 104
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
284% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 104%
Multiple Card Reader0 64GB
34GB free, PID 6479
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 27 27 27 27 27 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Read 32.6
Write 26.6
Mixed 27.6
SusWrite 26.3
38% 28.3 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 3.4
223% 3.67 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ8GX3M1A1600C9 0215 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 0215 CMZ8GX3M1A1600C9 0215 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.9% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 16.1
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 15.5
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 76.7
52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,935 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus H97-PLUS - $132

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $567
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback