Today's hottest deals

Asus P8H67

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.56% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive25.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8H67  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110627
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateOct 08 '21 at 10:13
Run Duration221 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
77.2% Very good
Memory 92.6
1-Core 97.3
2-Core 187
74% 126 Pts
4-Core 360
8-Core 351
48% 356 Pts
64-Core 360
22% 360 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 450
Gainward(10B0 0401) 1GB
CLim: 783 MHz, MLim: 902 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
7.56% Terrible
Lighting 8.8
Reflection 12.3
Parallax 8.4
7% 9.83 fps
MRender 12.4
Gravity 9.9
Splatting 8.8
8% 10.4 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.56%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
R5SL120G 120GB
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0707B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 52 26 48 51 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25.7% Poor
Read 221
Write 61.2
Mixed 46.4
SusWrite 43.6
20% 93.1 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 26
4K Mixed 1.4
45% 15.7 MB/s
DQ Read 22.7
DQ Write 67.1
DQ Mixed 1.5
14% 30.4 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 89%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
858GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 128 130 130 128 128 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Read 117
Write 118
Mixed 81.8
SusWrite 128
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
192% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 76%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$34
19GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 110 113 113 110 111 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
60% Above average
Read 99.2
Write 94.5
Mixed 51.3
SusWrite 110
65% 88.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 60%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G4H1 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
53.3% Above average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 16.8
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 16.5
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 63
64% 63 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 12: 1R 2G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
12% 40% 10 60 6 60 26" 1366 768 UMC0000 UMC SHARP
History: Score 28: 3R 3G 4B | Score 12: 1R 2G 1B
Typical P8H67 Builds (Compare 1,014 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H67 - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $407
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback