Dell Precision T1500

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive19.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Precision T1500
MotherboardDell Precision T1500  (all builds)
Memory2.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091130
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 15 '21 at 23:05
Run Duration279 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$320
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
66.4% Good
Memory 93.7
1-Core 66.9
2-Core 67.8
54% 76.1 Pts
4-Core 220
8-Core 277
32% 249 Pts
64-Core 306
19% 306 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Asus(1043 847B) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.8% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 0.8
2% 1.63 fps
MRender 2.5
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 2
2% 2.27 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.8%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Jinmuxi S 480G 480GB
218GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0522A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 18 178 147 3.1 1.2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
19.5% Very poor
Read 239
Write 212
Mixed 20
SusWrite 62.7
29% 133 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 8.9
4K Mixed 0.3
15% 5.33 MB/s
DQ Read 78.1
DQ Write 12
DQ Mixed 0.2
12% 30.1 MB/s
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
221GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 109 109 108 108 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
63% Good
Read 111
Write 111
Mixed 58.8
SusWrite 109
71% 97.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 63%
Great: 88%
Jmicron Generic 3TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0209
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.7 1.1 0.3 0.6 2 3.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
2.45% Terrible
Read 7
Write 6.5
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 1.4
4% 5.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.1
23% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 2.45%
Great: 108%
Jmicron Generic 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0209
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 3.7 3.6 3.4 3.9 4.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
5.53% Terrible
Read 14.9
Write 14.7
Mixed 13.5
SusWrite 3.7
9% 11.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 5.53%
Great: 108%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12
19GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.5 4.9 8.2 8.1 8.8 7.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
7% Terrible
Read 31.1
Write 24.6
Mixed 9.5
SusWrite 7.4
22% 18.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
14% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7%
Great: 30%
USB3.0 high speed 1TB
931GB free, PID 0711
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
4.74% Terrible
Read 15
Write 0.2
Mixed 0.2
SusWrite 0.5
3% 3.97 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.8
60% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 4.74%
Great: 123%
ASMT 2105 10TB
6TB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.2 2 3.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
5.95% Terrible
Read 8.5
Write 12.7
Mixed 10
SusWrite 1.8
11% 8.25 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.2
55% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.95%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KY996D-ELD KY996D-ELD KY996D-ELD 6GB
1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
27.4% Poor
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 8.3
26% 9.1 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 4
12% 4.17 GB/s
Latency 60.5
66% 60.5 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision T1500 Builds (Compare 422 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Dell Precision T1500

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $407
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback