WYSE XM CLASS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemWYSE XM CLASS  (all builds)
MotherboardInventec XM CLASS
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130717
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 06 '21 at 15:04
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD G-T56N
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
Memory 33.5
1-Core 19.2
2-Core 37.9
20% 30.2 Pts
4-Core 36.5
8-Core 38.2
5% 37.3 Pts
64-Core 37.2
2% 37.2 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6320
AMD(1002 9806) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.67% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 1.6
0% 1.3 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.9
1% 1.4 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.67%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS350 128GB
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 151 47 58 61 48 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.6% Below average
Read 222
Write 196
Mixed 204
SusWrite 91.3
40% 178 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 32.3
4K Mixed 14.7
58% 20.5 MB/s
DQ Read 86.7
DQ Write 68.7
DQ Mixed 34.1
37% 63.2 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 484D543432355336 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
10.6% Very poor
MC Read 3.8
MC Write 2.8
MC Mixed 4.4
10% 3.67 GB/s
SC Read 2.2
SC Write 1.7
SC Mixed 2.7
6% 2.2 GB/s
Latency 235
17% 235 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 12%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical XM CLASS Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: WYSE XM CLASS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback