MSI MS-16R3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics39.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive97.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemMicro-Star GF63 Thin 9SC
MotherboardMSI MS-16R3  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200326
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateJan 15 '22 at 00:59
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 15%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Memory 72.8
1-Core 114
2-Core 226
76% 138 Pts
4-Core 386
8-Core 574
60% 480 Pts
64-Core 575
36% 575 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile Max-Q)
MSI(1462 127E) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1123
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
39.8% Below average
Lighting 51.4
Reflection 59.6
Parallax 47.1
42% 52.7 fps
MRender 37
Gravity 46.7
Splatting 46.1
36% 43.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 40%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ 128GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK11.C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 395 129 115 112 118 120 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
Read 708
Write 460
Mixed 533
SusWrite 165
104% 467 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 72.1
4K Mixed 37.6
131% 46.4 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 458
DQ Mixed 333
272% 383 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 115%
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
799GB free
Firmware: M6CR054
SusWrite @10s intervals: 344 387 280 94 232 414 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
74% Very good
Read 460
Write 405
Mixed 388
SusWrite 292
87% 386 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 59.4
4K Mixed 19.1
93% 34.3 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 305
DQ Mixed 33.4
81% 164 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 74%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G3B1 16GB
2667, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.6% Average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 14.7
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 12.8
37% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 95
42% 95 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16R3 Builds (Compare 1,998 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16R3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback