Today's hottest deals

Asus X75A1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus X75A1  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X75A1
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20130522
Uptime67.8 Days
Run DateJan 19 '22 at 09:17
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 2020M
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
34.9% Below average
Memory 58.9
1-Core 20.4
2-Core 40.4
29% 39.9 Pts
4-Core 64.9
8-Core 73.2
9% 69.1 Pts
64-Core 59.8
4% 59.8 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Asus(1043 14C7) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3308
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
1.41% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 2
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.7 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 1
Splatting 2.1
2% 1.97 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.41%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23
393GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX002J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 19 21 27 26 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Read 16.8
Write 20
Mixed 13
SusWrite 23.8
14% 18.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.1
21% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 62%
USB DISK 2.0 16GB
7GB free, PID 5786
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.7 5.2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
2.99% Terrible
Read 11.7
Write 4.8
Mixed 0.3
SusWrite 5.5
6% 5.57 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
2% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.99%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF51264HZ-1G6D 1 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
17.3% Very poor
MC Read 3.8
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 5.2
17% 5.93 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 2.7
10% 3.4 GB/s
Latency 131
30% 131 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X75A1 Builds (Compare 125 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X75A1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback