Gigabyte GA-X570 I AORUS PRO WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive316% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 I AORUS PRO WIFI  (all builds)
Memory25.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200707
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '22 at 08:54
Run Duration477 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$270
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Memory 84.6
1-Core 144
2-Core 285
93% 171 Pts
4-Core 574
8-Core 978
94% 776 Pts
64-Core 1,538
95% 1,538 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$270
Nvidia(10DE 13A3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 3700 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Lighting 130
Reflection 120
Parallax 134
106% 128 fps
MRender 182
Gravity 119
Splatting 112
110% 138 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 106%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 1TB
150GB free
Firmware: RVT24B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 8,206
Write 7,321
Mixed 7,599
1,720% 7,708 MB/s
4K Read 630
4K Write 173
4K Mixed 255
1,373% 353 MB/s
DQ Read 1,751
DQ Write 1,172
DQ Mixed 1,336
1,030% 1,419 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
281GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1051 786 787 786 786 774 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
316% Outstanding
Read 2,655
Write 2,484
Mixed 1,942
SusWrite 828
442% 1,977 MB/s
4K Read 71.2
4K Write 192
4K Mixed 90.4
325% 118 MB/s
DQ Read 1,391
DQ Write 1,276
DQ Mixed 1,300
984% 1,322 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 316%
Great: 346%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$75
22GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 495
Write 405
Mixed 404
97% 435 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 68.2
4K Mixed 44.2
142% 48.3 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 161
132% 188 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 125%
SanDisk X210 512GB-$152
82GB free
Firmware: X210706
SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 340 342 341 342 345 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Read 404
Write 361
Mixed 234
SusWrite 342
75% 335 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 66.5
4K Mixed 33.2
122% 42.9 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 116
110% 172 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 101%
G-drive SSD 2TB
389GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 444 456 448 448 453 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Read 455
Write 448
Mixed 298
SusWrite 449
93% 413 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 49.4
4K Mixed 34.3
113% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 268
DQ Write 199
DQ Mixed 198
158% 222 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 91%
Seagate ST6000NE000-2KR101 6TB
2TB free
Firmware: EN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 164 160 161 162 163 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 119%
Seagate ST6000VN0011-1UL17Z 6TB
2TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 134 127 137 132 134 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Read 133
Write 120
Mixed 72.5
SusWrite 133
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
346% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 107%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB
977GB free, PID 0400
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 140 138 139 139 139 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 113
Write 97.3
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 138
128% 96.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.3
34% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
MC Read 37.2
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 36.8
93% 32.7 GB/s
SC Read 26.1
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 36.5
83% 28.9 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 I AORUS PRO WIFI Builds (Compare 2,530 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 144%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 I AORUS PRO WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $702
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback