Today's hottest deals

Asrock X470 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive275% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock X470 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20181109
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateMar 09 '22 at 21:27
Run Duration246 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$150
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Memory 76
1-Core 134
2-Core 256
85% 155 Pts
4-Core 507
8-Core 845
82% 676 Pts
64-Core 1,307
81% 1,307 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2702 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.76
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
105% Outstanding
Lighting 132
Reflection 146
Parallax 134
108% 137 fps
MRender 119
Gravity 135
Splatting 122
102% 125 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 105%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
366GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 884 791 825 820 814 824 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
275% Outstanding
Read 2583
Write 2,266
Mixed 1,806
SusWrite 826
418% 1,871 MB/s
4K Read 62.9
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 81.2
269% 91.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,034
DQ Write 666
DQ Mixed 878
647% 859 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 275%
Great: 346%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139
582GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 485 487 485 486 485 487 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 481
Mixed 445
SusWrite 486
108% 480 MB/s
4K Read 43.9
4K Write 92.9
4K Mixed 58.1
190% 65 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 370
279% 373 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 126%
Great: 133%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$95
2.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 167 174 174 170 173 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 194
Mixed 28
SusWrite 171
103% 143 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
145% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 101%
Great: 107%
WD My Passport 0830 2TB
2TB free, PID 0830
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 100 99 98 100 99 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
42.6% Average
Read 102
Write 104
Mixed 60
SusWrite 98.7
122% 91.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown? CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
76.3% Very good
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 27.2
MC Mixed 24.9
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 23.4
SC Write 28.8
SC Mixed 25.6
74% 25.9 GB/s
Latency 88.4
45% 88.4 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X470 Taichi Builds (Compare 678 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Taichi - $270

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $737
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback