HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx

Performance Results


Gaming 72% Battleship	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 60% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	85.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	172% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8307
Memory	6.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190522
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 15 '22 at 15:18
Run Duration	271 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	37%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	81.8% Excellent	Memory 91.6 1-Core 129 2-Core 241 87% 154 Pts	4-Core 401 8-Core 499 58% 450 Pts	64-Core 647 40% 647 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 81.8% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% HP(103C 82FA) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.65 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	85.7% Excellent	Lighting 106 Reflection 117 Parallax 98.8 87% 107 fps	MRender 96.5 Gravity 113 Splatting 97.5 84% 102 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 85.7% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB 99,566 User benchmarks, average bench 177% 67GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXB70H1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 306 274 249 237 267 241 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	172% Outstanding	Read 1,534 Write 856 Mixed 558 SusWrite 262 177% 803 MB/s	4K Read 42.9 4K Write 76.9 4K Mixed 54.4 175% 58.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1,210 DQ Write 600 DQ Mixed 597 525% 802 MB/s
Poor: 106% ↑ This bench: 172% Great: 236%
Seagate Expansion HDD 12TB 98 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 906GB free Firmware: 1801 SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 8.6 8.5 8.5 8.6 8.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	5.78% Terrible	Read 37.8 Write 38.5 Mixed 33.2 SusWrite 8.5 7% 29.5 MB/s	4K Read 3.6 4K Write 8.6 4K Mixed 1.6 12% 4.6 MB/s	DQ Read 2.7 DQ Write 10.3 DQ Mixed 1.4 3% 4.8 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 5.78% Great: 40%
Toshiba HDWR180 8TB 1,295 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 4.5TB free Firmware: 0603 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 66 169 196 190 198 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 211 Write 191 Mixed 58.1 SusWrite 151 111% 153 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1 179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 130%
Toshiba HDWR180 8TB 1,295 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 1TB free Firmware: 0603 SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 96 133 133 135 135 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	84.5% Excellent	Read 168 Write 171 Mixed 46.9 SusWrite 126 93% 128 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1.1 187% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 84.5% Great: 130%
Seagate ST2000DM001-1ER164 8TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 4.5TB free Firmware: 83.H0A83 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 71 66 70 73 72 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 33.7 Write 133 Mixed 27.4 SusWrite 70.4 48% 66.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.2 34% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 70% Great: 99%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 10TB 80 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 6.5TB free Firmware: D781 SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 186 196 200 202 201 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 18% Great: 102%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB 16,705 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 4.5TB free Firmware: D781 SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 125 122 118 124 126 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	67.7% Good	Read 111 Write 105 Mixed 81 SusWrite 123 78% 105 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 0.6 247% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 92%
ASMT 2115 10TB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 2.5TB free, PID 1153 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.3 8.3 8.4 8.3 8.4 8.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	23.7% Poor	Read 36.7 Write 36.4 Mixed 30.1 SusWrite 8.3 36% 27.9 MB/s	4K Read 7.7 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 1.2 233% 4.57 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 23.7% Great: 98%
ASMT 2115 10TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 4.5TB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.8 7.8 7.9 7.8 7.8 8.1 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	16.5% Very poor	Read 36.7 Write 37.3 Mixed 30.2 SusWrite 7.8 36% 28 MB/s	4K Read 4.9 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 144% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16.5% Great: 67%
ASMT 2115 10TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 772GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.4 8.4 8.3 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	20% Poor	Read 35.4 Write 35.3 Mixed 28.7 SusWrite 8.3 35% 26.9 MB/s	4K Read 3.4 4K Write 4 4K Mixed 1.2 190% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 20% Great: 67%
ASMT 2115 10TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 2.5TB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.2 8.1 8.1 8.2 8.2 8.2 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	19% Very poor	Read 36.5 Write 36.5 Mixed 31.7 SusWrite 8.1 37% 28.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 3.8 4K Mixed 1.1 172% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 19% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 2x8GB 20,415 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	59.9% Above average	MC Read 25.6 MC Write 20.5 MC Mixed 17.7 61% 21.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.4 SC Write 17.2 SC Mixed 15.7 44% 15.4 GB/s	Latency 64.8 62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 59.9% Great: 87%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx Builds (Compare 1,312 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 65%

Destroyer

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 55%

Yacht

System: HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx

CPU
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	512x
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	221x
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	219x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	326x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	232x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	141x

SSD
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	166x
MZVLW128HEGR-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 176%, 8,655 samples	86x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 196%, 44,403 samples	71x

RAM
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 74%, 24,860 samples	202x
HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 74%, 20,415 samples	136x
HMA81GU6MFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 75%, 2,884 samples	76x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 112% - Outstanding

Total price: $299

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16