Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive216% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME X370-PRO  (all builds)
Memory26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170929
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 29 '17 at 08:19
Run Duration278 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
76.3% Very good
Memory 79.9
1-Core 118
2-Core 216
78% 138 Pts
4-Core 390
8-Core 734
67% 562 Pts
64-Core 1,338
83% 1,338 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$350
Asus(1043 85E5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 385.41
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
128% Outstanding
Lighting 176
Reflection 198
Parallax 190
144% 188 fps
MRender 130
Gravity 175
Splatting 128
117% 144 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 128%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid KINGSTON SUV400S 120GB
413GB free
Firmware: 0C3J
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Read 47.1
Write 597
Mixed 245
68% 296 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 26.4
4K Mixed 15.8
77% 23.4 MB/s
DQ Read 322
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 59.9
98% 192 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 72%
Amd-raid KINGSTON SUV400S 120GB
413GB free
Firmware: 0C3J
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Read 69.3
Write 676
Mixed 221
74% 322 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 26.8
4K Mixed 15.3
75% 23.1 MB/s
DQ Read 329
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 62.5
99% 192 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 72%
Amd-raid Samsung SSD 840 120GB
413GB free
Firmware: EXT0
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
158% Outstanding
Read 628
Write 1,386
Mixed 97
158% 704 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 48.1
4K Mixed 28.6
107% 35.4 MB/s
DQ Read 346
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 107
148% 269 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 158%
Great: 77%
Amd-raid Samsung SSD 840 120GB
413GB free
Firmware: EXT0
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Read 49.5
Write 1,369
Mixed 97.2
117% 505 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 48.2
4K Mixed 27.6
106% 35.3 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 114
151% 273 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 134%
Great: 77%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
175GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
216% Outstanding
Read 2,004
Write 1,142
Mixed 1,140
315% 1,429 MB/s
4K Read 52.4
4K Write 99.1
4K Mixed 41.4
185% 64.3 MB/s
DQ Read 286
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 105
112% 188 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 216%
Great: 236%
Amd-raid Array 2 8TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: 8.1
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
154% Outstanding
Read 300
Write 237
Mixed 212
187% 250 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 4.85
4K Mixed 0.55
259% 2.66 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 154%
Great: 244%
USB 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0204
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
32.8% Below average
Read 39.7
Write 74.7
Mixed 23.7
34% 46 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 0.16
4K Mixed 0.64
100% 0.48 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 91%
Amd-raid Array 1 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 8.1
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 232
Write 152
Mixed 184
143% 190 MB/s
4K Read 1.88
4K Write 4.12
4K Mixed 1.04
270% 2.35 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 111%
Great: 212%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2800 MHz clocked @ 1400 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
MC Read 37.7
MC Write 32.4
MC Mixed 32.8
98% 34.3 GB/s
SC Read 22.2
SC Write 35.9
SC Mixed 26.9
81% 28.3 GB/s
Latency 80.7
50% 80.7 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,565 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $647
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback