Performance Results


Gaming 53% Yacht	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 67% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	62.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	97.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2696 v4 360 User benchmarks, average bench 75% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 22 cores, 44 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	73.6% Very good	Memory 76.8 1-Core 102 2-Core 198 71% 126 Pts	4-Core 378 8-Core 727 66% 552 Pts	64-Core 2,567 159% 2,567 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gigabyte(1458 371A) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 384.76 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	62.4% Good	Lighting 78.5 Reflection 78.4 Parallax 68.9 64% 75.3 fps	MRender 67.5 Gravity 72.2 Splatting 75.7 59% 71.8 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 62.4% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 482GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2559 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 278 (B1) Unknown 99 99 2 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 61 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 156 (F1) Unknown 99 99 5398175833	97.2% Outstanding	Read 503 Write 396 Mixed 237 84% 378 MB/s	4K Read 40 4K Write 72.4 4K Mixed 36.3 146% 49.6 MB/s	DQ Read 217 DQ Write 174 DQ Mixed 92.4 97% 161 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 97.2% Great: 133%
Intel Raid 5 Volume 32TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 19TB free Firmware: 1.0. Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 12% Great: 160%
WD Red 8TB (2017)-$243 4,534 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 4.5TB free Firmware: 83.H Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 56% Great: 110%
H/W RAID 50 16TB 8.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	39% Below average	Read 119 Write 90.2 Mixed 7.26 78% 72.1 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 0.54 4K Mixed 0.14 30% 0.89 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 9905625-074.A00G 9905625-075.A00G 9905625-074.A00G 9905625-075.A00G 9905625-074.A00G 9905625-075.A00G 9905625-074.A00G 9905625-075.A00G 128GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 137% 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	138% Outstanding	MC Read 62.3 MC Write 55.5 MC Mixed 51.9 162% 56.6 GB/s	SC Read 10.6 SC Write 16.7 SC Mixed 15 40% 14.1 GB/s	Latency 86.7 46% 86.7 ns
Poor: 135% ↑ This bench: 138% Great: 138%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 106%

UFO

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 97%

Nuclear submarine

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $350Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	6x
Quadro RTX 4000NvidiaBench 98%, 9,173 samples	4x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	3x

SSD
980 PRO with Heatsink 1TBSamsungBench 376%, 10,731 samples	4x
XPG SX8200 NVMe PCIe M.2 960GBAdata $185Bench 244%, 3,141 samples	3x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $198Bench 241%, 38,097 samples	3x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	3x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 1,799 samples	3x
Dominator DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 95%, 998 samples	3x

Value: 93% - Outstanding

Total price: $579