Today's hottest deals

HP Z440 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics70.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive259% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Z440 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 212B
Memory58.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230323
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 26 '24 at 19:40
Run Duration379 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
CPU0, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 97.1
2-Core 175
70% 119 Pts
4-Core 361
8-Core 726
64% 543 Pts
64-Core 1,627
101% 1,627 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$218
Gigabyte(1458 407D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.65
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
70.2% Very good
Lighting 87.4
Reflection 88.5
Parallax 81.5
71% 85.8 fps
MRender 111
Gravity 76.5
Splatting 70.2
68% 85.8 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SKC3000D2048G 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFK31.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1899 1920 1951 1975 1999 1993 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
259% Outstanding
Read 1,763
Write 2,095
Mixed 1,938
SusWrite 1,956
439% 1,938 MB/s
4K Read 43
4K Write 66.5
4K Mixed 55.4
171% 55 MB/s
DQ Read 429
DQ Write 248
DQ Mixed 330
248% 336 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 259%
Great: 614%
Lexar NM790 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 11296
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1903 1918 1954 1935 1919 1914 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
276% Outstanding
Read 2197
Write 2,067
Mixed 1,913
SusWrite 1,924
456% 2,025 MB/s
4K Read 47.7
4K Write 65
4K Mixed 53.5
175% 55.4 MB/s
DQ Read 453
DQ Write 272
DQ Mixed 362
270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 308%
This bench: 276%
Great: 605%
Fanxiang S880 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: SN15299
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1871 1848 1843 1852 1854 1848 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
264% Outstanding
Read 2107
Write 1,938
Mixed 1,632
SusWrite 1,853
424% 1,882 MB/s
4K Read 43.4
4K Write 52
4K Mixed 49.1
156% 48.2 MB/s
DQ Read 493
DQ Write 283
DQ Mixed 391
290% 389 MB/s
Poor: 264%
This bench: 264%
Great: 617%
Fanxiang S660 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: SN08661
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1862 1928 1937 1946 1951 1939 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
269% Outstanding
Read 2126
Write 2,072
Mixed 1,834
SusWrite 1,927
448% 1,990 MB/s
4K Read 42.6
4K Write 60.4
4K Mixed 49.2
160% 50.7 MB/s
DQ Read 440
DQ Write 282
DQ Mixed 359
268% 360 MB/s
Poor: 220%
This bench: 269%
Great: 502%
CT2000BX500SSD1 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: M6CR061
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 344 345 347 349 348 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 400
Write 346
Mixed 308
SusWrite 347
79% 350 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 26.6
4K Mixed 11.3
60% 19.6 MB/s
DQ Read 20.4
DQ Write 22.3
DQ Mixed 12.5
12% 18.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 Samsung M393A2G40DB0-CPB Samsung M393A2G40DB0-CPB 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
130% Outstanding
MC Read 58.2
MC Write 52.1
MC Mixed 47.2
150% 52.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 18
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 130%
Great: 150%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 23.8" 1920 1009 GBT2402 GIGABYTE G24F
Typical Z440 Workstation Builds (Compare 6,289 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: HP Z440 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 9% - Terrible Total price: $440
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback