Asus Z97-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics50.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus Z97-PRO  (all builds)
Memory16 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180418
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateApr 30 '19 at 19:00
Run Duration304 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
89% Excellent
Memory 97.8
1-Core 132
2-Core 260
92% 163 Pts
4-Core 433
8-Core 644
67% 538 Pts
64-Core 683
42% 683 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 89%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.7% Above average
Lighting 62.6
Reflection 67.6
Parallax 65.2
51% 65.1 fps
MRender 72.2
Gravity 59.8
Splatting 54.7
50% 62.3 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO 500GB (TurboPC EX)
219GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 218 220 218 218 223 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 85% Great: 119%
Samsung 860 EVO 1TB (TurboPC EX)
317GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 251 324 341 351 339 350 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 478
Mixed 466
SusWrite 326
100% 443 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 54.5
188% 66.8 MB/s
DQ Read 157
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 188
161% 231 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 110%
Great: 126%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 5TB
807GB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 27 27 28 27 31 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
33.1% Below average
Read 86.5
Write 70
Mixed 24.3
SusWrite 27.5
38% 52.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.6
176% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 90%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 5TB
2TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 19 19 19 20 19 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 116
Write 140
Mixed 97.8
SusWrite 19.8
70% 93.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.7
349% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 90%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
1TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 35 35 36 35 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
29.7% Poor
Read 66.5
Write 66.3
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 34.8
35% 48.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 6.4
4K Mixed 0.6
235% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 92%
Toshiba MD04ACA500 (TurboPC EX) 5TB
21GB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 129 140 131 152 135 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
74.4% Very good
Read 124
Write 126
Mixed 50.3
SusWrite 134
79% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
236% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 89%
Toshiba MD04ACA500 (TurboPC EX) 5TB
816GB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 106 107 107 106 107 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
83.4% Excellent
Read 184
Write 178
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 105
96% 132 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
383% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 89%
Hitachi HUA723030ALA640 (TurboPC EX) 3TB
598GB free
Firmware: MKAOAA50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 70 72 65 81 74 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.8% Average
Read 83.7
Write 61.5
Mixed 52.7
SusWrite 72
50% 67.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
188% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 70%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 5TB
346GB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 33 33 35 34 35 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
34.3% Below average
Read 84.8
Write 104
Mixed 67
SusWrite 33.3
54% 72.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.6
192% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 90%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 33 34 33 33 34 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 108
Write 101
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 32.9
56% 76.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.6
195% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 92%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
802GB free, PID ab38
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 125 128 130 133 131 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 84.8
Write 115
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 125
138% 98.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.6
192% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 75%
WD easystore 25FB 10TB
2TB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 28 27 28 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 124
Write 136
Mixed 90.5
SusWrite 27.2
122% 94.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.2
216% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 99%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 5TB
716GB free, PID ab34
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 136 142 143 140 145 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
61.9% Good
Read 19
Write 98.3
Mixed 55.8
SusWrite 135
120% 77.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 9.6
4K Mixed 0.7
352% 3.6 MB/s
DQ Read 0.3
DQ Write 10.2
DQ Mixed 0.9
379% 3.8 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 78%
BUFFALO External HDD USB Device (TurboPC EX) 3TB
2.5TB free, PID 0257
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 39 34 38 33 44 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
172% Outstanding
Read 240
Write 134
Mixed 118
SusWrite 39.7
157% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 41.6
4K Mixed 2.8
1,515% 15.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1.9
DQ Write 33.8
DQ Mixed 4
1,293% 13.2 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 172%
Great: 313%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Xtreem-LV-2400 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 2400 MHz clocked @ 2448 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
MC Read 31.3
MC Write 32.6
MC Mixed 27.9
87% 30.6 GB/s
SC Read 20
SC Write 24.5
SC Mixed 26.6
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 47.1
85% 47.1 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97-PRO Builds (Compare 634 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-PRO - $215

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $848
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback