Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 40% Jet ski	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 44% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	33.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	344% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
Motherboard	Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING (all builds)
Memory	20.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210329
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 11 '21 at 12:17
Run Duration	356 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	25%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	93.6% Outstanding	Memory 73.9 1-Core 153 2-Core 304 94% 177 Pts	4-Core 606 8-Core 1,150 104% 878 Pts	64-Core 2,088 129% 2,088 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 93.6% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 864B) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.81 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	33.5% Below average	Lighting 44.1 Reflection 42 Parallax 39.1 36% 41.7 fps	MRender 37.5 Gravity 42.6 Splatting 27.9 29% 36 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 33.5% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$103 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 765GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1665 1477 1481 1505 1509 1505 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	344% Outstanding	Read 2,592 Write 2,510 Mixed 1,639 SusWrite 1,524 463% 2,066 MB/s	4K Read 61.3 4K Write 175 4K Mixed 92.8 304% 110 MB/s	DQ Read 1,283 DQ Write 1080 DQ Mixed 1,188 888% 1,183 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 344% Great: 410%
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88 171,271 User benchmarks, average bench 212% 354GB free Firmware: P3CR013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1069 1068 1065 1058 761 537 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	219% Outstanding	Read 1,147 Write 937 Mixed 926 SusWrite 926 221% 984 MB/s	4K Read 60.8 4K Write 160 4K Mixed 81.2 281% 101 MB/s	DQ Read 685 DQ Write 648 DQ Mixed 275 314% 536 MB/s
Poor: 130% ↑ This bench: 219% Great: 295%
Crucial MX300 1TB-$175 21,936 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 734GB free Firmware: M0CR070 SusWrite @10s intervals: 483 486 386 377 376 377 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 384 Write 482 Mixed 326 SusWrite 414 91% 402 MB/s	4K Read 25.3 4K Write 103 4K Mixed 41.3 146% 56.5 MB/s	DQ Read 367 DQ Write 326 DQ Mixed 341 257% 345 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 105%
WD Green 5TB (2014)-$170 1,889 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 453GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 130 131 133 127 128 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	65.4% Good	Read 99.2 Write 116 Mixed 73.2 SusWrite 128 77% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 195% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 65.4% Great: 97%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$120 2,225 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 74GB free Firmware: AR15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 86 88 89 84 84 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 87%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$120 2,225 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 13GB free Firmware: AR13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 36 84 84 86 86 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 87%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$120 2,225 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 62GB free Firmware: AR17 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 86 85 87 88 87 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87 42,465 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 125GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 76 82 83 80 79 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	38.6% Below average	Read 54.4 Write 64 Mixed 55.2 SusWrite 78.5 47% 63 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 5.5 4K Mixed 0.4 188% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87 42,465 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 436GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 86 83 87 89 91 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	40.2% Average	Read 50.4 Write 74.9 Mixed 61.6 SusWrite 87.9 51% 68.7 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 5.5 4K Mixed 0.5 199% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 40.2% Great: 90%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 218GB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 107 109 111 110 110 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	60.6% Good	Read 102 Write 112 Mixed 28.2 SusWrite 109 64% 87.8 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 158% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 60.6% Great: 107%
JetFlash TS512MJFV20 1GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 3% 0GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	4.53% Terrible	Read 9.2 Write 3.5 Mixed 5.2 SusWrite 3.6 6% 5.38 MB/s	4K Read 5 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.8 59% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.53% Great: 5%
WD My Book 25EE 6TB 6,646 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 437GB free, PID 25ee Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 36 36 36 37 36 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	20.3% Poor	Read 35.7 Write 35.6 Mixed 30.2 SusWrite 36 47% 34.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 115% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 20.3% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BLS8G4D30BESBK.8FD BLS8G4D30BESBK.8FD BLS8G4D30BESBK.8FB BLS8G4D30BESBK.8FB 32GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	85.4% Excellent	MC Read 33.3 MC Write 30.6 MC Mixed 31 90% 31.6 GB/s	SC Read 22.2 SC Write 18 SC Mixed 28.5 65% 22.9 GB/s	Latency 92.7 43% 92.7 ns
Poor: 85% ↑ This bench: 85.4% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,666 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 80%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $138

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $190Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	1,414x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $145Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	543x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $175Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	535x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	323x
RTX 2060Nvidia $273Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	231x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	209x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	175x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $84Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	172x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $69Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	135x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	246x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $35Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	185x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	156x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 96% - Outstanding

Total price: $652

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $37
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16