Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive185% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME X370-PRO  (all builds)
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200728
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJul 18 '21 at 11:57
Run Duration422 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
70.9% Very good
Memory 74.9
1-Core 118
2-Core 212
76% 135 Pts
4-Core 360
8-Core 624
60% 492 Pts
64-Core 597
37% 597 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 11 (Ryzen iGPU)
Asus(1043 876B) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.45.36
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Lighting 20.9
Reflection 15.2
Parallax 32
17% 22.7 fps
MRender 12
Gravity 23.4
Splatting 14.1
13% 16.5 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 480GB
405GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1223 554 588 596 579 580 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
185% Outstanding
Read 1,462
Write 1,890
Mixed 1,414
SusWrite 686
307% 1,363 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 89.8
4K Mixed 51.1
170% 59.6 MB/s
DQ Read 874
DQ Write 564
DQ Mixed 763
557% 734 MB/s
Poor: 125%
This bench: 185%
Great: 262%
Intenso Sata III 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: S0813A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 387 384 386 385 386 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 425
Mixed 373
SusWrite 386
94% 418 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 78.7
4K Mixed 29.7
123% 45.7 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 48.5
93% 179 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 95%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$79
244GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 60 65 66 66 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 99.1
Write 86
Mixed 29.9
SusWrite 64.3
51% 69.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
66% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
242GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 89 92 94 92 92 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 101
Write 99.4
Mixed 49.6
SusWrite 91.7
62% 85.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 84%
WD Re 4TB (2012)-$120
251GB free
Firmware: 01.01K03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 91 94 94 95 95 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 102
Write 96.6
Mixed 56.5
SusWrite 93.3
64% 87.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1
204% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 96%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
241GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 175 178 179 179 178 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Read 148
Write 144
Mixed 79.5
SusWrite 178
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 114%
Seagate ST32000542AS 2TB-$100
248GB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 60 65 66 69 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
37.8% Below average
Read 65.8
Write 55.9
Mixed 40.6
SusWrite 65.5
42% 57 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 61%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$80
3TB free
Firmware: CC52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 78 79 79 78 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 137
Write 147
Mixed 72.7
SusWrite 78.5
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 96%
Covecube Virtual Disk 2TB
7.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 47 49 47 46 52 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 25% Great: 105%
ST3000DM 001-9YN166 3TB
326GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 113 111 117 113 116 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 120
Write 123
Mixed 89
SusWrite 114
151% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
64% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 68%
WDC WD20 EURS-63SPKY0 2TB
236GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 109 110 103 105 109 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.8% Average
Read 122
Write 126
Mixed 48.3
SusWrite 104
132% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
30% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 47%
SAMSUNG HD204UI 2TB
240GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 109 110 103 105 109 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
33.2% Below average
Read 56.3
Write 70.4
Mixed 38.7
SusWrite 103
95% 67.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
46% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 54%
ST8000AS 0002-1NA17Z 8TB
403GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
47.9% Average
Read 101
Write 146
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 0
107% 81.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 10.8
4K Mixed 0.8
396% 4 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 9.2
DQ Mixed 0.9
345% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 92%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00D8PB0 2TB
234GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
20.2% Poor
Read 127
Write 127
Mixed 82.5
SusWrite 0.2
105% 84.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
41% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 59%
HGST HDN 728080ALE604 8TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0.2 0.1 0 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.8% Below average
Read 143
Write 152
Mixed 72.3
SusWrite 0.1
114% 91.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.9
143% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 48%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00DC0B0 2TB
341GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
20.5% Poor
Read 129
Write 126
Mixed 88.2
SusWrite 0.4
108% 85.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
41% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 57%
ST4000DM 000-2AE166 4TB
412GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
21% Poor
Read 110
Write 91.5
Mixed 66
SusWrite 0
82% 66.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$66
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
MC Read 31.5
MC Write 32.7
MC Mixed 28
88% 30.7 GB/s
SC Read 22.9
SC Write 34.9
SC Mixed 25.5
79% 27.8 GB/s
Latency 90.6
44% 90.6 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 24" 1280 720 GSM56CC W2442
Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,626 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $593
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback